Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Learning is a lifelong process. Some people think that past learning is old school of thought and has nothing to do with the present condition; however, some disagree. In my view, learning about the past has significant value for the ones living in the present world for two main reasons.
To begin with, the past knowledge teaches you to lead a better present life. It reminds you to prevent similar mistakes done in the past and makes you learn from the consequences. For example, today when we learn about the world history, we read about the world war that took place years ago between nations. It took lives of thousands of soldiers all over the world, destroying families, spreading catastrophic disabilities and causing unreasonable waste of resources and finances. This was the result of inability of nations to dissolve their conflicts for a treaty. Certainly, today this world history teaches us to build and maintain a society which is not based on war, competition and disputes; but on peace, unity and love. This is what out society should aim for.
Moreover, learning of the past lays down the fundamentals which encourage us do further advancement. In fact, lessons from past experiences are steps towards progress. For instance, decades ago, in the field of medicine and surgery, researchers came up with Coronary artery bypass grafting to combat cardiac arrest and failure. After learning about its serious post-operative complications , minimally invasive bypass surgeries came into practice. Following that, procedure of angioplasty was discovered to reduce morbidity and promote early recovery. This technique is currently practiced in cardiac institutes all over the world as an effective intervention for heart attack, over coronary artery bypass grafting. This demonstrates how learning about the past limitations motivates you to do advanced research.
In conclusion, I support the idea that past experiences are very valuable to the present generation. This is because its learning prevents us from repeating the old mistakes; and because past experiences provides us with the foundation and motivates us towards progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...ther advancement. In fact, lessons from past experiences are steps towards progress. For instanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 390, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...its serious post-operative complications , minimally invasive bypass surgeries cam...
^^
Line 13, column 40, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
... In conclusion, I support the idea that past experiences are very valuable to the present genera...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 188, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...repeating the old mistakes; and because past experiences provides us with the foundation and mot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40532544379 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86400449237 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8397313472 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1578947368 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285773377976 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879741648362 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663673999402 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185842518295 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448102203964 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.