Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Over the past three decades, remarkable progress has been made in teenagers’ understanding of the world and society. There is a long-running debate within the concept of whether teenagers play a pivotal role in the future of society or not. While some people hold the opinion that their impacts are undeniable, others believe that they have no power to change society's destiny. I, personally, concur with the earlier group because of two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following essay.
First of all, current youngsters are wholly more aware of political and social events than teenagers were in the past. As a matter of fact, they access state-of-the-art means of communication and networking channels. Therefore, they are aware of their determining role in social and political issues since they consist a big part of a country's population. Their perspective about current world affairs are dramatically changed by cautiousness of news and daily events. On the other hand, youngsters just cared about their education or playing with friends in the past decades. My personal experience can bring this notion home. When I was a high school student, the sole fact that I knew about political condition was our country's president's name. In contrast, my seven-year-old son has a lot of information even about foreign politics such as other president's notions and lectures.
Second, everybody knows that the government pays much more attention to young people today as they know the young’s importance in determining societies' future. In fact, young strata would be the adult part of the near future in every country. It is clear that they can determine society's future by their decision and votes in election events. In addition, parents are more aware of their children’s significant role in the country's fate, thereby imparting their political and social knowledge to them. As an illustration, consider a mother who thinks that her child would be an essential agent in the government. Therefore, she gives her son all facts about social issues. That child would obviously be a determiner factor in society in the near future. The more information about current affairs children have, the more their role would be stronger.
To wrap up, with all these reasons taken into account, I do believe that contemporary teenagers are more involved in society than they were in the past era. That is because, they have more information about society’s issues through social media, and the government and parents also consider them as pivotal agents in the country’s fate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ding of the world and society. There is a long-running debate within the concept of whether te...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, in addition, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17899761337 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81728267984 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54415274463 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0577023661 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6363636364 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0454545455 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135694860139 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404594511525 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496689932457 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892980589196 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442905940768 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.