Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to

Essay topics:

Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?

In today's competitive world whre we live, sudents experince many various kinds of teaching methods in different junctures of their lives some of which are more advanatgeous for their performance. In this vein, opinions are divided as to whether all members of a group should receive equal scores when it come to team projects. While some people hold the opinion that same grade is a proper system of evaluation, I believe that students had better be assesed by their individual performance, instead of group performance. In the following paragraphs, I will substantiate my viewpoint.
First of all, considering one grade for all members of a team, instructors cause conflict and friction between students. Needless to say, each student has a level of energy and perseverance, which is different with their peers; thus, it is possible that their highest level of efficiency do not keep up with others', thereby unintetionally involve less than other members in the group projects. Accordingly, other members might think that the weaker student either has a negative intention or is a lazy person, whereby they will have humiliative or aggressive behavior toward them since their scores depend on the activities of all individuals. A study has been conducted at Arizona State University revealed there is a significant correlation between students conflicts numbers and the method in which teachers grade their works. A team of researchers, analyzing collected data through a designed questionairre, showed that the more the group team's score depends on each member of it, the more friction students will have with each other.
The second ground to be mentioned is that by giving equal grade to all pupils in a team, teachers might ruin their incetive as in some cases this is not a fair approach to grade high performance and intelligent students. It is crystal clear that, all students do not have the same level of IQ and mental power, thereby being able to show their potentials and push the team forward. In such circumstances, some pupils lose their interest in the projects as they fall behind counterparts or are smarter tham others; however, if teachers evaluate them in a same way, they will lose motivation as they either know they do not deserve the good score, if were weaker than others, or will be disappointed by a low acore since know they are entitled to have better grades, if were the smartest member. Therefore, it will inflict damage on productivity of not only clever students but also weak ones. For example, when I was in high school, for history class, we were assigned to work on a paper in a team consisted of more weak students than strong ones, so I should have worked hard. But eventually, I gave up as I see no progress in paper due to low performances of my teammates. Thus, we even could not obtain a passing grade, although I did my best. This experience ruined my inducement toward history matters.
To wrap up, with the aforementioned reasons taken into account, I am of the opinion that students should not be graded the same in groups because it is not a fair course of action and bring about discord between students.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...nce. In this vein, opinions are divided as to whether all members of a group should receive e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...oup should receive equal scores when it come to team projects. While some people hol...
^^^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a same way" with adverb for "same"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ers; however, if teachers evaluate them in a same way, they will lose motivation as they eith...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, first of all, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2626.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 534.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91760299625 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78470149477 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520599250936 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 813.6 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.3462808464 48.9658058833 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.888888889 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 20.6045352989 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262701211875 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749495259659 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504733844 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158763773308 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0110036740034 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.