Universities have changed over the past few decades, and some of them are not requiring students to take history courses. Personally, I believe it is still extremely important to study some history materials. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, studying history subjects provides an infrastructure to develop new ideas. Most university students try to do research, so they need to learn how things were born. Consequently, they will learn the basics and they might change a little bit on it to develop a new invention. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a junior student, I took an introductory pharmacology seminar. The professor began each lecture by focusing on the history of the pharmacological class and the structure of the drugs. This provides me with a good idea about the basic of drugs. In my senior year, I did a research by taking the advantage of the basic structure and adding some other things (pharmacological action bonds). As a result, my new drug is in the invention office for approval. Had I had not studied the history and the basic of medications structure, I would not have invented a new drug.
Secondly, history courses give chances for us to pride our ancestors. The older generation did a lot to build, create, invent, and make our world great to live, and as a result, it is very important to teach all the students the history of everything. So, they can take them as a role model. For instance, my brother, who is studying at Yale University, recently made a new light. That is mainly because he visited Thomas Edison house and he is the role model for my brother. In my opinion, if my brother had not studied about Thomas Addison, he would not have created a new light.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is very beneficial for students to study history. This is because it helps them to develop new ideas, and because it gives the opportunity to thanks the past generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...earn the basics and they might change a little bit on it to develop a new invention. My ow...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
... change a little bit on it to develop a new invention. My own experience is a compelling exam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...asic of drugs. In my senior year, I did a research by taking the advantage of the basic st...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her, who is studying at Yale University, recently made a new light. That is mainl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73863636364 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81653177502 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5083403277 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4285714286 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7619047619 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143183361663 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444710292368 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361272402944 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886268284341 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343710406308 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.