Although it is generally acknowledged that studying history contributes to students’ development, from my perspective, compulsory history courses for all university students are improper and unrealistic.
First and foremost, the required history courses are improper to a university, because it violates the spirit of freedom of universities. All university students have the right to study what they interested in and refuse to engage in projects or courses that are indifferent to them. Therefore, universities should embrace all the differences of students instead of forcing them to study a specific subject. My university, for example, some students choose engineer as their major just because they dislike social science subjects like history. Imposing the history courses to them won't benefit them at all. They will get tired of it soon and start to study their engineering subjects in history class, which wastes students' time and university's money. Consequently, the mandatory history class goes against the elemental spirit of the university.
Additionally, the required history courses will deprive students of time for studying, which makes this plan unrealistic. Students are already fully occupied by all kinds of group works, assignments and examinations. It is apparent that they don't have any free time to have an extra history class. If a history course is jammed into students' tight schedules, the students will be bombarded by hectic schedules. As for me, though I love history and I am always looking forward to learning history in my university, I can hardly find time to do it. The whole week has already been filled with my nine required courses and extremely time-consuming assignments. The status quo of college students’ timetable makes this fantasy proposal untenable.
To summarize, a top-notch university is expected to enjoy a spirit of freedom, and extra history courses will deprive students of studying time. Therefore, compulsory history courses are improper and unrealistic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to engineer'
Suggestion: to engineer
...sity, for example, some students choose engineer as their major just because they dislik...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... examinations. It is apparent that they dont have any free time to have an extra his...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, look, so, therefore, as for, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55663430421 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06190600411 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540453074434 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6932180284 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261801210065 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095483674531 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495934045374 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177118201714 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269622334397 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.