Education has been one of the most crucial things that children need to be matured and prosperous in their own future. However, in this modern era with advance in technology and under their influence, it has been more important since technology can have either constructive or distractive aspects. Scholars have been searching about this issue for years and now a question arises regarding to this research is does technology act as impediment for educating children or not? As a matter of fact, I believe that it could be both beneficial and harmful for the process of learning. In what follows, I will substantiate my double-side point of view.
First off, by emergence of more innovative tools for improving life quality, people become more comfortable than past decades. For one thing, they are more likely to find relevant information through theses media specially web sites. For example, as the new laptops have been invented, it became easier for teacher managements to alter their method of teaching from traditional method to online systems. If they do this new system, students will learn more and become more productive.
On the other hand, it goes without saying that these tools are so harmful not only for their progress but also for their health. Most students are addicted to online games which make them nervous and stressful. This leads them to lose concentration on the material they are supposed to learn. As a psychological survey conducted in some of schools in my country shows, these days almost all children get accustomed to social networking Web sites and the most surprising result from this research indicates that the more the time they spend, the less they can focus on lessons. For example, my younger brother was so clever in elementary school when there was not so many distractive things. However, the time he entered to high school coincided to the time that lots of online games had been arrived and all students in his age got stock with these games.
To put it briefly, contemplating both sides, one soon realizes that technology have both helpful and harmful facet that every individual should be aware of them so they are able use them in proper way. I recommend students that they be in constructive side and not use focus on negative aspects of technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the schools') or simply say ''some schools''.
Suggestion: some of the schools; some schools
... As a psychological survey conducted in some of schools in my country shows, these days almost ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, for example, as a matter of fact, for one thing, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97416020672 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62983853461 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568475452196 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6231241757 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.235294118 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172176849591 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052676411287 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430332504371 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966207748438 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555556079192 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.