Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Employers should be required to provide smoking areas for their employees who smoke cigarettes.
In modern world smoking is a bad habit among some people in the society. Although it is considered as fatal to our body, but still people prefer to consume and waste a lot of money. For such persons separate smoke rooms should be provided in public places or even in offices. Following are some of the points enlisted.
Firstly¸ in work places, there is an increase in the people who smoke daily. Due to severe stress and exceeding work load, the employees are more prone towards this ill habit of consumption of cigarette. Women are generally declined towards smoking, but now a days, the number is gradually increasing. The smokers result in many problems like lung cancer, lever infection, ulcers and throat cancer. But the persons, who are not smokers, still coming into the contact of the smoke from a cigarette, are inclined to these problems. Therefore, persons willing to smoke, and must be provided with a separate room, leading to avoid any discomfort and threat to their health.
Secondly, in public places, like bus terminals, shopping areas, people who smoke, allow the fumes to merge in the environment and makes it difficult to inhale. It especially affects the women and children, thereby worsening the lungs and causes cough, problem in breathing, heart attack, thereby, thereby, leading to cancer. Thus the smokers must be provided with a different room to avoid disturbance to others.
In conclusion, the smoking must be banned in working places due to ill effects to both consumers and non-consumers. Otherwise, allowed to use smoke rooms, keeping a safe environment to breathe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...laces or even in offices. Following are some of the points enlisted. Firstly¸ in work pl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...generally declined towards smoking, but now a days, the number is gradually increasing. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...rally declined towards smoking, but now a days, the number is gradually increasing. Th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...k, thereby, thereby, leading to cancer. Thus the smokers must be provided with a dif...
^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...s and non-consumers. Otherwise, allowed to use smoke rooms, keeping a safe environment...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 43.0788530466 16% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 265.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07924528302 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63275097844 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596226415094 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6228277267 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7333333333 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246760678931 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771857497318 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648079236278 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143568502771 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307107356086 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.