Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In the modern era, jobs are regarded as a crucial factor contributing to the life satisfaction of people. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the availability of proper jobs with the advent of technology. Many people adhere to the view that decades ago, people could find the perfect occupation with good financial benefits easier than now, while I strongly believe people in contemporary time can easily determine what job is the best for their future. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the advent of the technology provided plenty of new professions which increases the chances of individuals to choose a convenient occupation. In the past, It was hard to find a proper job based on your interests, and there were just a few positions with high salaries alongside a good social status. For instance, my uncle was interested in mathematics and statistics during his college, so he continued his studies at university to become a mathematician. After his graduation, it took a lot of time for him to find a proper position as a statistical analyzer in a company, though he did not earn much. However, nowadays, there are a lot of companies that have plenty of open positions for people with a degree in mathematics willing to pay high salaries to encourage them to work there.

The second equally significant point to be mentioned is that there are tons of resources available for people to seek and continue their fields of interest everywhere. However, many years ago, access to the facilities was limited to capital cities. For example, about twenty years ago, my mother went to Tehran to study heart surgery at the university. After finishing her studies, she came back to our hometown, Neyshabur, to find a job in our local hospitals. But, she was told that our hospitals did not have enough facilities to perform such complex surgeries. As a result, she ended up becoming a university professor, and her salary was a lot less than what she could earn in hospitals. Although, now, our city has been equipped with a high-tech hospital with a lot of surgeons working there.

In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that finding a perfect career is easier nowadays due to the improvements in the facilities and resources of the cities, plus people have a variety of choices between the new professions formed around the technology.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in brief, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95271867612 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88030203445 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543735224586 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8900127055 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.235294118 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8823529412 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11937664628 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037364379491 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329999367026 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712576230496 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332530780176 0.0645574589148 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.