Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Means of transportation for human beings has been changing rapidly through the history. It probably started by using other humans as the transportation vehicle, and nowadays we are using sophisticated technologies such as airplanes and advanced cars. Therefore, it might be difficult to predict the future of transportation tools. One major question in this field is: Will cars, as popular means of transportation, be used more frequently? I believe so. There will be more cars in near-future horizon, say 20 years, because cars not only are getting cheaper, but also they are becoming more comfortable. Moreover, cities are getting even bigger. Thus, people will be more willing to use cars in the future.
The first aspect that deserve to be pointed out is that high growth rate of the cities will cause more cars to be put in use. It seems that cities are getting more popular for people to live in. People migrate from rural areas to metropolitan areas in search of a better, more comfortable life. Therefore, the cities will get bigger in the future. Since people use cars to travel in the cities and public transportation are proved to be ineffective in many large cities, it seems reasonable to predict that people will prefer using more cars for their transportation purposes.
Aside from the point I made above, one cannot oversee the fact that since cars are getting more advanced and comfortable, men will be interested in buying and using them in the future. Using advance seatbelts and airbags around the cabin, cars are getting safer in comparison to the past. Moreover, digital technologies have their way into the car industry, making it more comfortable. For instance, when a person gets into a car, central management unit of the car will adapt seats, temperature and mirrors of the vehicle automatically based on previous adjustments of the person. Therefore, since the cars are more desirable, more people will yearn for having and using one.
In a word, owing to the aforementioned causes and elucidations described in the previous paragraphs, it appears to be reasonable to draw the well-founded conclusion that there will be more cars put in use in next 20 years because there are larger cities to communicate in and also cheaper, safer and more comfortable cars will give them an extensive advantage in comparison to other means of transportation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05852417303 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90769450042 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491094147583 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.7291037185 48.9658058833 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.631578947 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6842105263 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218428381037 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841255433654 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065898408773 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161442051098 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257861341458 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.