Do you aGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT?
Internet should be like other services such as roads and government should provide it to the public with no cost.
Nowadays, despite the many disparities people have in a wide array of areas so far as one's opinion goes, one point that almost everybody agrees upon is the importance of internet. This is owing to the fact that internet plays a pivotal role in relatively all aspects of our social and personal life. That being said, in this regard, different opinions might stir heated debates as to what role should a government play in providing internet. One particularly reoccurring idea brought up is that government should consider internet as a public issue and provide it for free. Many concur with this notion and I found my self as one of them. In what follows, the rationale for this thesis will be elaborated by focusing on 2 reasons.
First and foremost, having provided free internet, the government enhances the access to information for people. It worth to mention that access to information is one of the human rights that has been indicated in both Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Universal Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Since abovementioned documents are ratified by United Nations General Assembly, they are binding and states are obliged to respect them and take all the required measures for implementing them. A subtle comparison between Armenia and Iran could aptly shed light on my argument. As far as we know, internet users in Armenia are not asked to pay for either registration, domain, or traffic since, by the recent changes in their code of Access to Information, the government is in charge of all the costs related to internet. As the Statistics revealed, since the enforcement of the modified code, the status of Armenia in terms of freedom of access to information enhanced by 12. On the other hand, there are private companies in Iran which are providing internet. The costs for using their services fluctuates rapidly and haphazardly. That is why many Iranian citizens are reluctant to use internet and as a matter of fact, Iran is one of the worth countries in respect of freedom of access to information.
The other equally important reason which deserves some words here is the fact that government is able to control the hazardous content of some websites. Unfortunately, dark web, a part of web which contains illegal and brutal content, is spreading these days. Rarely do private sectors are able to turn them down or warn them to stop their activities because their developers are skillful hackers who cannot be caught and traced easily. Had the governments provided free internet in all around the world, the proliferation of these kinds of websites would have been decreased. Almost all the countries are concerned with the crimes committed in or by means of internet e.g. child pornography, hate speech, human trafficking, etc.
In summary, based on the above arguments, it seems more judicious to say that government should be responsible for providing free internet because it both increases the access to information and prevents cyber crimes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...have in a wide array of areas so far as ones opinion goes, one point that almost eve...
^^^^
Line 5, column 730, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hy, hate speech, human trafficking, etc. In summary, based on the above arguments...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., first, if, so, as to, in summary, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2511.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0523138833 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77224154915 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53722334004 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2713888771 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21440301063 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621297142012 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542633679971 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131319655662 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351219346954 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.