Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The Internet should be like other services (such as roads),
and government should provide it to the public at no cost.
Without a shadow of a doubt, Internet Service has been altering the world in different facets and becoming an indispensable necessity for every individual. As a matter of fact, the government plays a pivotal role in providing people with various services comprising roads, parks, and the Internet. An unanswered question in this area is whether the government should be responsible for the charges of this service and let people use it for free, like roads or not. I firmly believe that Internet Service should be provided in every society for free and anyone could afford it. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will explain these ideas through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, the crux of the matter lies in the fact that the Internet has become so essential and a rudiment need in the given hectic life that one deprived of it might confront a myriad of arduous circumstances. In other words, having access to a well-based Internet facilitates our dominant lifestyle. However, many people can not afford this service owing to its prohibitive costs. Consequently, a host of families might become divested of a myriad of opportunities, such as better studying, more expedient businesses, worldwide news, extensive communication. Another tremendous consequence of the lack of access to the Internet is precluding individuals get accustomed to future technologies. For example, the Corona Virus pandemic is a compelling instance of my statements. In fact, this pandemic demonstrated the great essence of having access to Internet Service in different aspects of life. Actually, if it were not because of the Internet, the educational system and businesses would be completely closed. It is clear to see why the government should take a step toward providing people with free Internet access.
Another reason to be mentioned is that giving free services by the government attracts lots of people, especially juveniles who have the responsibility of creating grand infrastructures for future generations. It would be better to say such services encourage members of every society to make their best use of it, and in the case of the Internet, spontaneously seeds the plant of a new type of jobs, such as online shops and lots of other occupations. On the contrary, in this trend that virtually everything changes to an online version, former traditional works like agencies and offices start to wilt. For instance, when a person has an infinite Internet package without being concerned about its cost, they can use it as a source to make money by using different approaches, and we see some samples of it, such as becoming a blogger or making viral videos. Hence, free Internet can bring prosperity among the people and may result in economic thriving.
Reflecting upon all the reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that the advantages of the free Internet overweight its disadvantages on the grounds that first, it supports impoverished people to keep up with the essential need of it, and second, it encourages the society to exert this opportunity as best as they can.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2592.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 501.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17365269461 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97305372471 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534930139721 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.9187761745 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.05 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234326140239 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714049208588 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605605509829 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139500765089 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06997651915 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.