After having a presentation in class, you want to
evaluate it. Which of the following do you think would
be better for you?
watch the recording by yourself
invite other attenders to discuss and give
opinions
There is no shortage of opinion on the tremendous implications that personal skills refinement has on the quality of life for every individual. Hence, evaluating professional treatments and intercommunications becomes critical since it helps to enhance particular abilities in the long run. One of these skills is conceived as the performance of presentations.
I firmly believe that gathering other attendees to discuss and give their views on the presentation can help assess it precisely. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will develop these ideas through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, others will scrutinize the presentation objectively. Anyone except for the presenter sees the seminar without any former influential bias. On the contrary, watching the recorded video of the presentation by the announcer with a previous viewpoint on his show can not be evaluated as accurately as the late statement. For instance, if I consider my performance appealing even if it is not right, changing this viewpoint is readier by the notes of others than myself. Hence, it leads to a better evaluation and subsequently better presentations. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my personal experience. When I was in high school, we were supposed to give a lecture for our team, and I was the candidate presenter for our group. After the performance was over, I got some informative advice which helped me enhance my techniques.
Secondly, every individual has a unique mindset that helps different perspectives be observed by each one. In fact, covering various facets of a performance hampers channeling all of the attention to a sole point. As a result, every aspect of presentation skills will be examined, so the final assessment is a comprehensive report about it. Drawing from my own experience, one of my friends noticed my body language during the lecture, and the other remarked on my monotonous voice and advised me to use a fluctuating tone of my voice. It's certainly clear to see why these points help to evaluate the show and improve it.
To sum up, all reasons mentioned above lead us to conclude that asking other audiences to examine the performance and to give their ideas is a great way to evaluate your skills and presentation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...e tremendous implications that personal skills refinement has on the quality of life f...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 177, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ets of a performance hampers channeling all of the attention to a sole point. As a result,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, except for, for instance, in fact, as a result, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16533333333 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16198081377 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578666666667 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1109329891 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.947368421 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7368421053 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168701596358 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496870328237 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355037141148 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842517220229 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054928999936 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.