Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
Without a shadow of a doubt, humans have distinctive proficiencies due to their brains' sophisticated characteristics. An unanswered question in this area is whether individuals should exploit their brains' potency to enhance assorted skills. Despite all the arguments asserting that people should concentrate on developing a specific skill in order to become adept in that field, I believe otherwise, maintaining that individuals should thoroughly exert their power to improve various skills so they can superbly flourish in their lives. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, people's mindsets have a considerable effect on their dominant lifestyle. To put it more simply, individuals unintentionally apply their knowledge directly to their daily lives, forming their future prosperity. Therefore, a wide spectrum of skills brings about spectacular opportunities for an individual since they can readily come up with innovative solutions by combining their expertise in various fields. In addition, individuals posing different skills can take a leap forward in scientific achievements due to their ability to thoroughly consider all facets playing role in a perplexing issue. On the other hand, People who are adroit in merely one major are usually deprived of this opportunity, owing to the one-dimension nature of their knowledge. As a matter of fact, individuals who immerse in a vast range of activities can improve their life quality and become more successful by enhancing a multitude of perspectives toward issues. My personal experience is an excellent example of this. Considering my abilities in various fields, including sport, music, and science, I can always point out meticulous details in dilemmas, which nobody pays attention to them, streamlining the solution. Hence, my new utilitarian ideas will facilitate the way for me to succeed.
Another reason worthwhile mentioning is that as people try to deal with various skills, they improve their ability to manage their schedules. Graphically, when individuals endeavor to assimilate assorted issues, they learn the effective approaches for administering the time in order to accommodate all the assignments. On the contrary, a person who is merely concerned about one topic does not have any problems planning the tasks. To put it in a vivid picture, a juvenile who attends school participates in a music band, and studies two languages simultaneously have to be organized and accurate in their plans, which will form their attitude more oriented. Besides, multi-skill people can get accustomed to the circumstances with high pressure, making them balance their anxiety levels, yet, others involved with one skill can readily lose track since they have not ever undergone that tension.
Reflecting upon all reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that boosting a myriad of skills exert a beneficial influence on both individuals' performances and personalities. This is because not only does help people come up with innovative ideas and consider their views, but it also makes them more organized.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, while, in addition, as a matter of fact, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2673.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56875 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10076645431 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589583333333 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 846.9 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2747586868 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.65 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190505321539 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572540206856 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525395267296 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131581456646 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336481228151 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 58.1214874552 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.01818996416 126% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 86.8835125448 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.