It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Without a shadow of a doubt, The government's investments in various activities accelerate their completion, not to mention its tremendous implications on a society's enhancement. An unanswered question in this area is which field should The government's financial aids be devoted to. Despite all the arguments asserting that improving public transportation has beneficial effects on people's everyday lives, I believe otherwise, maintaining that boosting Internet access is a wise choice in order to keep up with the world's technological trends. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, nowadays, people's dominant lifestyles are immensely engaged with assorted technologies, which underlie Internet access. In other words, people exert the Internet to contact each other, establish new connections, and importantly do their occupations. As a matter of fact, the copious number of careers, which is constantly rising, using the Internet, in some cases working at home, has increased the need for great Internet access. On the other hand, the more Internet-based jobs, the less the pleas for public transportation become because people do not have to go to another place in order to do their jobs. Therefore, to leap forward in providing sufficient Internet access, governments' subsidies are required. My personal experience is a persuasive example of the enormous Internet access demand. Regarding the Covid pandemic in 2020, most companies and offices were closed, and we, employees, were told to manage the tasks and works at home. After this episode, working online was inevitably further accommodated in our lives, which required efficient Internet access.
Another reason worthwhile to mention is that improving Internet access enhances society in multiple aspects. To put it in a vivid picture, providing a better Internet infrastructure needs computer engineers' expertise, which not only does create different job opportunities but also motivates undergraduate students to study harder. On the other hand, making improvements in public transportations are usually more time-consuming and may interfere with people's daily life. For example, in my country, to enhance the quality of metros, people had no access to some of the stations for a long period, which made trouble.
Reflecting upon all reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that governments should spend money on enhancing Internet access due to its great importance and demand. This is because not only is Internet access a substantial requirement for many careers nowadays, but also its improvements are tangible and motivates students at universities. As it is evident, although improving public transportation has advantages, they are infinitesimal when compared with the implications of boosting Internet access.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lity of metros, people had no access to some of the stations for a long period, which made ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, as for, for example, as a matter of fact, in other words, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2440.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70093457944 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15199299342 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586448598131 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1729113798 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.421052632 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39913520807 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111744250662 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074606244312 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25069124322 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863576407964 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 58.1214874552 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 10.9000537634 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.