Which of the following do you think would be the most
effective way that a teacher can use to make students
more interested in classes?
Using more technological ways
Asking students to work in groups or teams
Explaining how the lessons have a connection to
real-world
There is no shortage of opinion that education is one of the integral facets of nowadays societies. Schools play a significant role for children by channeling them to their approach. It is my firm belief that teachers should intrigue children to make them more inclined to participate vigorously in the classes by asking them to work in tandem and within groups for several reasons which I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, children are curious and avid; hence, they tend to share and intercourse their learning with their classmates and peers. While concentrating on an assignment in a team, students can observe each other's method of assimilating the questions and their approach to answering them. On the other hand, when students do an assignment in individuals, they would never get a chance to share informative knowledge. For example, if one of the members doesn't fully understand a question or doesn't know the answer to it, others will help him grasp it, and then they write down the result altogether.
Moreover, students are gregarious; therefore, they are always looking for different ways to communicate with each other and find new friends. Working in groups seeds the plant of new bonds and also lets children experience situations in which they should learn how to cope with them. In addition, grouping creates a conducive atmosphere for children to improve their companionable skills.
At last but not least is that children have a sense of security and safety while working in a group. W can have two different views on this reason. First is virtually the complement of the previous reason and ensures the members who can't answer one question that they will get over it with others help. Secondly, even if all of the members of a team can't assimilate a problem and solve it, there will be a sense of empathy in the group, and because all of them have the same feelings, it could stem the air of confidence and power that they are not alone. The former feeling results in a circumstance that leads the children to spare no effort to solve the problem in tandem.
To sum up, all reasons mentioned above lead us to conclude that asking children to work within a group is the most efficient alternative to interest them in the classes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...nt in a team, students can observe each others method of assimilating the questions an...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...dge. For example, if one of the members doesnt fully understand a question or doesnt k...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s doesnt fully understand a question or doesnt know the answer to it, others will help...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ious reason and ensures the members who cant answer one question that they will get ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... it with others help. Secondly, even if all of the members of a team cant assimilate a pro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...y, even if all of the members of a team cant assimilate a problem and solve it, ther...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89002557545 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68180245658 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542199488491 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4615331564 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4375 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161571235839 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508099238034 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455274311857 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902824026442 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159702269956 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.