Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
After completing high school, students should take at least a year off to work or travel before they begin studying at a university.
Without a shadow of a doubt, a university plays a pivotal role in students' lives, not to mention its profound influence on their future occupations' formation. An unanswered question in this area is whether students should take a break before entering the university and spend a year working or traveling. Despite all the arguments asserting that pupils need to rest in order to increase their academic performance or improve new social and pragmatic skills through working, I believe otherwise, maintaining that students should immediately begin studying at university after graduating from high school. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, circumstances' consistency can assist students by facilitating the approach toward their goal. To put it more simply, continuous years of studying without any gap help students get accustomed to the university's environment readily. Besides, given the close association between lessons taught at high school and university, the less away from these lessons students are, the easier they will assimilate the subjects. On the other hand, considering the forgettable nature of some curriculums, it will be arduous for pupils to remember some meticulous details after a period, making it hard to keep up with the class flow. Therefore, students should prevent getting separated from studying conditions. For example, think of a graduated student from high school who tends to travel and visit multiple places before attending university. He will immerse in his trips to an extent that will thoroughly forget about being a student and the situations related to it. Afterward, it will be pretty hard to recall some points and study approaches. In addition, he can invariably be distracted by thinking about the places meanwhile the classes.
Another reason worthwhile mentioning is that although high school is a prerequisite for university, it does not provide the students with a comprehensive perspective for starting an occupation. In other words, students do not have adequate proficiency in essential skills required for working, which will be acquired during the university. It goes without saying, the performance of working in that period will be insufficient, making adolescents despondent since it makes them feel they are incompetent. However, if they try to work meanwhile their study at university, they can exploit their lessons in tandem with other social skills learned by communicating with various people. Moreover, students should learn how to deal with harsh conditions, which usually occur at universities, to become ready for taking on real responsibilities. For example, when students start work prior to the university, they might not be aware of many scientific aspects since they have not attended university. Besides, they may not get along with the vast spectrum of people working there due to the few friends they had at high school and not seeing various mindsets anywhere.
Reflecting upon all reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that attending university right after graduating from high school is more beneficial for pupils. This is because not only have students fresh knowledge and studying habit from high school, but also they will learn dispensible expertise in order to exploit at work after attending university.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2860.0 1977.66487455 145% => OK
No of words: 522.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47892720307 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93658603293 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 866.7 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6670615869 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32829539339 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957878417843 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657546313472 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215538563555 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026056891034 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 86.8835125448 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.