Are government doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating?
Without a shadow of a doubt, nutrition not only does play a pivotal role in peoples' lives, but it also takes a great deal of time every day to either prepare the meals or have them. One decisive factor in every communitys' dominant dietary habits is its government. An unanswered question in this area is that whether the government has been successful in instructing people to concentrate on healthy diets and foods nutrients. I firmly believe that the government has been adversely educating society around this subject. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will develop these ideas through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, the tremendous implications of advertisements are inevitable and explain the growing demand for a specific lifestyle and versus. As a result, filtering the context of pervasive commercials and channeling them to demonstrate the beneficial effects of a healthy lifestyle can better motivate people to choose their sustenances carefully. Needless to say, when an ad is shown meanwhile a kids' cartoon or even an adults' series, both of these groups unintentionally pay attention to its content, and if it illustrates a family who is having pizza for dinner, it spontaneously influences its audience to order a junk food for their dinner. On the contrary, if that ad shows a family enjoying a nutritious dinner, it encourages the latter family to have a healthful meal. Hence, it is clear to see why advertisements can have such a heavy influence on educating people to pay attention to their foods' nutrition and how people are precluded from grasping the importance of this matter. According to current circumstances in publications, it is evident that the government is not perfectly coping with this matter.
Another reason to be mentioned is that nowadays people have a hectic life, working from dawn to dusk, and therefore, there is not enough time for them to spend scrutinizing foods' nutriment. This shortage of time seeds the plants of growing demand for fast foods, and it also fades the importance of healthy eating habits. Furthermore, the government has not taken a step toward improving this circumstance, such as supplanting the enormous number of fast-food restaurants with better-nutrient food packages, motivating people to have their homemade snacks and lunches at work in different ways, or disturbing better food in workplaces and schools instead of low-nutrients meals. As it is evident, this situation is conducive to a decrease in paying attention to the nourishments people eat.
Reflecting upon all the reasons mentioned above, I greatly believe that the government has not exerted its prowess effectively to inform people about the significance of a healthy diet on the grounds that first, it broadcasts impoverished and groundless advertisements, and second, the lack of adequate stimulus for a more robust lifestyle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
...own meanwhile a kids cartoon or even an adults series, both of these groups unintentio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, therefore, while, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2417.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27729257642 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1174367869 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558951965066 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.4121684393 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0625 100.406767564 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30565689469 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896346184929 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811084319912 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169324063085 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569811946614 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 11.7677419355 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.