On top of the basic need of eating have been satisfied, food nutrition and healthy diets are becoming hotly eye-catching topics of societal concern. Many governments also realize the importance and urgency of food education. In my country, governments are doing well in educating people to pay attention to food nutrition and healthy eating habits through publicizing, related policies, as well as providing additional education services in primary school.
The first thing the government is doing good is publicizing the idea of health. To be concise, people nowadays can see many charitable commercials sponsored by the governments in educating the balance of food nutrition and the importance of exercising while they are shopping, taking the subway, and eating at restaurants. These well-designed posters with creative and humorous ideas largely attract the customers’ eyes and plant the notion of healthy eating in people’s minds subconsciously. Not only the governments are publicizing the idea in a physical way, but also digitally. When people are watching some entertainment programs on television, such as variety shows, charitable commercials will show up again and again to remind people of the danger of eating high-fat and high-sugar food. Therefore, governments are doing good in promoting healthy diets throughout the medium.
In addition to highlighting the importance of healthy eating in different forms of media, the governments also release many positive and effective policies for farmers who conduct organic farming, encouraging more farmers can participate in these eco-friendly practices, such as bio-agriculture or permaculture. The policies include reducing their income tax, assisting the farmers to have a good share in the supply chain of the supermarkets, as well as facilitating the local organic food organizations. In this way, farmers who conduct organic farming will have more motivation to keep their business in a sustainable way financially and ecologically, which enlarges the chance of customers buying their food that contains high nutrition without using artificial fertilizers.
Lastly, the government also supports primary schools establishing their own school gardens and mini farmlands, opening related courses for primary students. In China, there are many schools that adopt these education modes, especially in rural areas, and are constantly practicing how to convey the idea of healthy diets to students. For example, the teachers invite young students to plant a variety of vegetables and to observe the status of the soil whether it is too dry or too moist. Without using chemical fertilizers, students are encouraged in using the waste garbage to make organic fertilizers. And during the harvest, students are delighted in tasting the food that they grew in the spring. By doing so, the students understand the importance of a healthy diet and the balance of food nutrition. They would like to eat more food that they grow in person rather than snakes and junk foods.
To sum up, the governments are doing good in expanding the knowledge of food nutrition through different mediums, policies for farmers, and education in schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a physical way" with adverb for "physical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...he governments are publicizing the idea in a physical way, but also digitally. When people are wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sustainable way" with adverb for "sustainable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... more motivation to keep their business in a sustainable way financially and ecologically, which enl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2713.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52545824847 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0127659109 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507128309572 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 825.3 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9896260625 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.65 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.55 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480731656985 0.236089414692 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135711318015 0.076458572812 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107891404084 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28414634613 0.150856017488 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138875263051 0.0645574589148 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.