Are governments doing well in educating people to pay
attention to the importance of the food nutrition and
healthy eating?
Food has one of the most pivotal roles in people’s prosperity. However, to some extent, the government should consider the significance of nutrition in food, which is highly debated. In this regard, some hold the view that the government has nothing to do with the amount of nutrients in food. Even though, others, including me, believe that government should be taking action to increase awareness among people, benefiting people and the government both.
To begin with, the government does this investment in food nutritious for people owning the fact that to diminish other expenses the government should pay. To elaborate, Health problems absorb a lot of money of the national budget. A lot of insurance companies and institutes are engaged with this issue. Therefore, the government should had better make a decision whether they will invest in raising information among people, reducing hospital expenses, or, providing money for insurance companies, which will be integrated with raising taxes. For example, I read a comparison between two countries in an international well-known magazine. The results of the comparison were fascinating. The more the country put money to augment the knowledge of people, the less money they needed to give people for health problems, thus, the less money the country increase the taxes.
Second, the other benefit that the government would take is healthy people means better job output. To be more specific, the job environment demands healthy people to increase efficiency. As a result, companies’ profits would raise, then, by taxing the money and distributing it among people, the people would be more pleased with the consequences. Eighter the government and people living on the counter would benefit from the program of raising information about healthy food. Should the government not invest in healthy food and increasing information among people, They would not take benefits of the national income and happier people.
To sum up, by augmenting the information among people by the movement, not only the government would benefit financially, but there would be much happier and healthier people living in peace and calm.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36151603499 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76418666663 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501457725948 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4962961009 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.176470588 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241946482907 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873283630698 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636613655525 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154041348 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588065373127 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.