Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Without a shadow of a doubt, teamwork plays a pivotal role in assorted projects, and its tremendous implications on the eventual production are undeniable. An unanswered question in this area is whether the collaboration among the team members is better achieved via online platforms or meetings in person. Despite all the arguments asserting that using online infrastructures is more convenient in different aspects and is more consistent with the trend of technology, I believe otherwise, maintaining that holding meetings in person exerts a beneficial influence on the corporation. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, thoughts and opinions about the project can readily be misunderstood while using e-mails. To put it more simply, using e-mail as a medium for communicating ideas can bring about a myriad of obstacles, such as having transmission delays. On the other hand, people can better convey their thoughts and plans in person, and there is an opportunity for simultaneous interactions. For example, one can throw a new idea, and others can immediately react to it, while via e-mail, it would take a lot of time to collects everyone's opinion. My personal experience is an excellent example of this. I remember working in two different groups with two different approaches to teamwork. In the one, which used online platforms, a member's late feedback and other problems sparked an argument that led to the project's failure in the long run. However, in the group that worked in person, all tasks were done on time.
Another reason is that seeing each other vigor and energy makes everyone work more enthusiastically. In other words, teammates can improve each other's hope and attitude toward the project. As a result, as soon as one of the members feels incompetent or reluctant to continue the way, others can help them recover from that negative attitude. Moreover, team members can assist each other in technical facets such as fixing a bug in the program or help grasp a specific matter. For example, consider a group of programmers who are working on a website. One might get stuck in the basic steps because of a bug and thus feel despondent, which is normal if they are alone, yet, if others were beside them, they could expeditiously work things out jointly.
Reflecting upon all reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that communicating about a project in person brings a host of benefits. Not can people better convey the issues and ideas, but also they can help each other more effectively, spread positive vibes, and become more vigorous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a member' or simply 'members'?
Suggestion: a member; members
...n the one, which used online platforms, a members late feedback and other problems sparke...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 815, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'projects'' or 'project's'?
Suggestion: projects'; project's
...ems sparked an argument that led to the projects failure in the long run. However, in th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...other words, teammates can improve each others hope and attitude toward the project. A...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13888888889 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90540152555 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576388888889 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1528229098 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174675601649 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544016157322 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352831871366 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107868729131 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434656457322 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.