Many people think that leadership is a naturally born thing comes from inside. They say not all the people can be leaders, at the same time we see kids act as leaders without any body teaching them how to be like that and this is the best approve that leadership is an inside thing. Although I understand their point of view, I have a different opinion. I believe any one can be a leader that it is because leadership is teachable, and is updatable.
First of all, no one can deny that some people are leaders by default. Also no deny that those people are not always successful leaders. On the other side, there are people who are under the definition of "regular people" but they are perfect leaders. This definitely means one thing, leadership is teachable. That is why many universities are usually running leadership programmes to teach all those in a position of supervision or leadership so they can play their role effectively.
Second, leadership changes at the same pace as anything around us, so leaders are always under the subject of update. They have to update themselves regularly to keep themselves up to date with all the successful approaches of leadership. This is why most of the big named companies pay tons of money to update their leaders employees. I read recently an essay that differentiate between boss and leader. What got my eye the most is that not every boss is a leader. For example, leader works hand by hand with his employees while boss just gives them orders. Leader directs the wrong action in the right direction while boss punishes the employees. Leader is much respectable by the employees, that is why he/she has to keep themselves updated.
In conclusion, there is no one can't be a leader but there is a person who can do it effectively and one who can't do it in a professional way. My advice for all the companies and institutions to give leadership courses to their employees and to keep them updates. This at the end will ensure the success of their work and the success of all the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anybody'?
Suggestion: anybody
...time we see kids act as leaders without any body teaching them how to be like that and t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
..., I have a different opinion. I believe any one can be a leader that it is because lead...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rship is teachable, and is updatable. First of all, no one can deny that some ...
^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...hat some people are leaders by default. Also no deny that those people are not alway...
^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one thing, leadership is teachable. That is why many universities are usually run...
^^
Line 4, column 699, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... much respectable by the employees, that is why he/she has to keep themselves upd...
^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...dated. In conclusion, there is no one cant be a leader but there is a person who c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n who can do it effectively and one who cant do it in a professional way. My advice ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a professional way" with adverb for "professional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...o it effectively and one who cant do it in a professional way. My advice for all the companies and in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68144044321 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72115515064 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501385041551 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3455151256 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169404525174 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545749470515 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441745721472 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108504075832 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242149241166 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.