I agree that parents now are more involved with their child’s education than in the past. I think this, because of three reasons. The three is that the economy is worse, there is more technology, and there are now programs that allow parents to be more intact with the students’ studies.
First of all, the economy is not as good as it was in the past. The economy is hard now, and it is harder to get jobs. Parents want their children to get good jobs, so that they can make money easily, and make a lot. Therefore, parents make all their children go to outdoor schools, and take tutors. Parents are usually all a lot more strict to their children.
Secondly, there is now a lot more technology. Very few parents are savvy with technology, but they do want their kids to be very good at using technology. Technology is very important in the future, so it is very important to be good with technology now in order to have a good life and get a job easily in the future. Parents make kids go to classes such as coding class in order to become better with technology.
Finally, there are many programs that encourage parents to take part in students’ studies. This means that parents give advice or help the school with things that help students learn better. Sometimes, parents volunteer and do such things as a music period, that is from volunteering. This helps students know if they like different things.
Parents now are involved in their child’s studies more now than then. The future is full of many things like worse economy and better and more technology. Sometimes, there are even programs that allow parents to help in the studies of students. These all prove that as time goes on, parents will more and more be likely to be involved in children’s studies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ol with things that help students learn better. Sometimes, parents volunteer and do su...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 261, Rule ID: PROVE_PROOF[2]
Message: Did you mean 'proof' (noun) instead of prove (verb)?
Suggestion: proof
...p in the studies of students. These all prove that as time goes on, parents will more...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, i think, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70347003155 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5658538863 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429022082019 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2899365128 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.55 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.85 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296277959662 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1072719015 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10270108757 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188028851567 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762869379851 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.57 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.