Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.
When aristotle said, "Being vulnerabity is the most important part in frienship," he showed that honesty is the key element in freindship. Historically, people who were honest in their freindship have stayed together longtime regardless any situation there were in. Honesty between friends strengthen their relationship and lead to them being helpful to each other.
First of all, being frank help people to strengthen their bond in relationship. People who meet each for their first time are totaly different; however, if they started to share their experience they find that they have something in common that can bind them together in that people need to share that experience without lying. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. About four years ago, I enrolled in my advanced level, and I was a new commer in my shool. At that time I had not chosen what course to take. I was on the fence about whether to do literature or science. A student approached me and told me the problem I had. I was sincer about my goal of life, and I found that we the same goals. Therefore, he helped to make a best choice. Ever since we have been friends because we we were vulnerable to each other.
Secondly, being vulnerable to a freind is necessary because it help to know freinds who are helpful. Unless people shared their journey, In no way the can find friend who they have the same goals. For instance, when I was in primarly school I had struggle to find a friends who we shared the same spiritual believes because I did not know the important of sharing. However, when I attended the ordinarly level I learn to share what I believe that stand out for me, and this helped me to find friends who did not lead me to deviate my goals of life.
To sum up, in order to created strong relationship which last long there some condition that guide friend: being honest to each other. This help people to enhance their friendship in a more productive way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... is the most important part in frienship,' he showed that honesty is the key elem...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 745, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ame goals. Therefore, he helped to make a best choice. Ever since we have been fr...
^
Line 5, column 800, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: we
...Ever since we have been friends because we we were vulnerable to each other. Sec...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther. Secondly, being vulnerable to a freind is necessary because it help to...
^^
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...le to a freind is necessary because it help to know freinds who are helpful. Unless...
^^^^
Line 9, column 266, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a friend' or simply 'friends'?
Suggestion: a friend; friends
... primarly school I had struggle to find a friends who we shared the same spiritual believ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71264367816 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63428334434 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514367816092 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9577923739 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3157894737 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3157894737 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0467854974455 0.236089414692 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0165696145172 0.076458572812 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240224915757 0.0737576698707 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0367008188384 0.150856017488 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032573614099 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.