Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without a shadow of the doubt, nowadays, people have a lot of tasks to do, and doing these tasks properly has effects in their lives. Many people contend that that regardless of doing a lot of things people can do their task well, while others assert that people do just of few of them well. Both of opposing arguments appear to be somewhat convincing and stand to point. However, my personal experience and actual observation of life have led me to agree that people just do very few of their things in an appropriate way. In ensuing lines, I delve into two reasons to substantiate my point.
First, currently, in modern society people have a lot of roles to do. Because of the variety of tasks they can not do all of them well. By having a lot of works to do, people choose just a few of them to be an expert in them. For example, consider a family that in that family a mom that have two kids have to work. The time that the mother can spend for her children is little. So, this mum cannot be with her kids in comparison with a full-time mom. As you can see some times, we can not manage our tasks in order to do them perfectly.
Second, nowadays, people prefer to use expert people to do their works instead of doing themselves. There are a lot of expert people for doing different works. So, we can use from these skilled people and save our precious time. For instance, in my country, there is a website that a lot of freelancers have a profile on that site, and they all have skills in the different area. When we need an especial ability we just search on that site and choose a suitable person. I think in this way we not only use our work better but also we can save time to do other things.
In a nutshell, based on what I see in my society, I agree that people perform a few things well because of two important reasons. Firs of all their duties are a lot. In addition, there are expert people that they are available for doing works by paying money. Also by using these people they can save time for doing other works. I hope someday people can do their roles well. Because if we do not perform well in our tasks, our country will destroy. For having an improved country we have to do our works well, even we have just one work to do.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 502, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...people just do very few of their things in an appropriate way. In ensuing lines, I delve into two rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ciety people have a lot of roles to do. Because of the variety of tasks they can not do...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ilable for doing works by paying money. Also by using these people they can save tim...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.24418604651 4.8611393121 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21412570173 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427906976744 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8018867365 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.12 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330285486308 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114521202656 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846541786402 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237980111754 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055280510287 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 11.7677419355 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 58.1214874552 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.02 10.9000537634 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.