Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Students do not respect their teachers as much as they did in the past.
Currently, society has witnessed an unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, thus individuals are attaching more and more importance to the education industry. Some of them reckon that compared to the past, students do not respect their teachers as much as they did. While others rebut that students respect teachers more than ever before since they are easily well-educated with the abundant educational resources accumulated for thousands of years. Personally speaking, I concur with the first opinion for reasons as follows.
To start with, with the advancement of technology, teachers in schools are not the mere authority for students. To be more specific, nowadays, based on the elevation of living qualities and income, there is an increasing number of city dwellers equipping their children with diversified educational technology, such as cell phones or I pads with a bunch of educational applications, which renders those children with more approaches to more profound knowledge and teachers with varieties of pedagogical methods. By utilizing the newly-emerging technology, they no longer worship their teachers as much as they did since they recognize that what teachers impart to them is not profound and all of these pieces of knowledge can be attained from other sources. The research conducted to evaluate students’ attitude toward their equipment related with studies demonstrates that nearly all students are provided with advanced technology devices and 78% of them contend that the content of educational application is more appealing to them than what their teachers convey during the class, which makes them feel boring when listening to lectures given by their teachers and behave impolitely in class, for instance, chatting with classmates sitting around, falling asleep or playing cellphones to kill the tedious time. This research illuminates that it is the advancement in technology that gives rise to the diminished respect for teachers.
What’s more, the continuously changing awareness toward teachers also should be taken into consideration in this issue. For one thing, numerous students are educated to think critically so as to maximize their creativity and not regard what teachers teach them as the mere truth, however they are not reminded of the basic discipline of showing respect for teachers. Hence, more and more students, for the sake of forgetting fundamental respect for teachers, behave impolitely, which indeed annoys teachers. For another, some social media is continuously hyping some scandals intertwined with a small group of badly-behaved teachers, therefore some students are wholly convinced by these scandals tarnishing teachers’ reputation, which makes students harbor the idea that none of their teachers are role models for them, thus show less respect to their teachers. For instance, one of my classmates in high school emailed to our mathematical teachers. In this email, he contended that owing to the scandals emerging in another high school, he was concerned about the fairness of our contestant selection for a mathematical competition held by our teacher and insisted that our mathematical teacher was involved in this scandals without sufficient evidence. This example indicates that since students are not mature enough to tell right from wrong, the hyped scandals easily exert detrimental effects on their attitudes toward teachers, which makes they do not respect teacher as they did in the past.
Admittedly, some students still behave in a socially acceptable way to respect their teachers, nevertheless, it is self-evident that students living in modern society show less respect to their teachers.
In a nutshell, from what has been discussed above, I would like to reiterate my opinion that students no longer respect their teachers as they did in the past owing to the development of technology and the altered consciousness toward teachers.
- If your friend wants to reduce living expenses, which would you suggest?1. Find a roommate that can share the living expenses.2. Buy the new technology products less frequently.3. Shop for less expensive food and cooking at home 73
- If your friend wants to reduce living expenses, which would you suggest?1. Find a roommate that can share the living expenses.2. Buy the new technology products less frequently.3. Shop for less expensive food and cooking at home 70
- A leader should have strong opinions and not change his or her opinions 90
- What is the most useful way to help the natural environment?Plant more trees and build parksStores stop providing plastic bagsIncrease access to public transportation to reduce the number of cars on the road 90
- If your friend wants to reduce living expenses, which would you suggest?1. Find a roommate that can share the living expenses.2. Buy the new technology products less frequently.3. Shop for less expensive food and cooking at home 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 336, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'pad'
Suggestion: pad
...al technology, such as cell phones or I pads with a bunch of educational application...
^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...udents are educated to think critically so as to maximize their creativity and not regar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1223, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ur mathematical teacher was involved in this scandals without sufficient evidence. T...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, such as, for one thing, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 93.0 52.1666666667 178% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3346.0 1977.66487455 169% => OK
No of words: 604.0 407.700716846 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53973509934 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95746018188 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95068787283 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 294.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486754966887 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1020.6 618.680645161 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 122.297249699 48.9658058833 250% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 185.888888889 100.406767564 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5555555556 20.6045352989 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38888888889 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317736892081 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123402123456 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11672310172 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207087545103 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041748827529 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 11.7677419355 182% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 58.1214874552 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.1575268817 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 170.0 86.8835125448 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.