Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.

Without any shadow of a doubt, children are the corner stone of a successful society, for they are the member of community that is coming. In this regard, education plays a pivotal role in preparing them for the future. With this in mind, there is a heated controversy as to whether teachers need to express their political and social views to their students or otherwise. I, personally, subscribe to the latter view based on a quite a few reasons, three of the most substantial of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
The most compelling reason is that teachers should evaluate their behavior in the classrooms. It is crystal clear that in schools, different students tend to various things, while some of whom may be secular, while others might be liberal. Some may believe freedom for all people, while others hold the opposite view. This fact, however, might be troublesome in school, especially when teacher deal with students in high school, who are above twelve years old. In such age, they believe that their beliefs are completely true, and as a result, they resist with anyone enjoying different attitudes. Therefore, if a student points out his or her teacher holds the opposite viewpoint, they will not pay attention to him or her any more, which leads to decrease class efficiency.
Another interpretation as to why I do not concur with the first perspective in the introductory paragraph lies in the fact that there is a Persian proverb, the equivalent of which in English may sound like this, " Children's minds is like a stone, and if you carve anything on it, it will be remain for all the time". Teachers deal with in students in elementary school, who are below twelve years old, are required to be more conservative owning to the fact that in this age, there is a strong bond among children and their teachers--or, to put it in another way, they really like their teachers, and they tend to believe and do what their teachers say, rather than their parents. Accordingly, if teachers freely talk about their opinions and their beliefs in the class, whether we accept it or not, they will manipulate children's mind because children think that whatever their teacher think and say is true, and they believe them.
In summary, having considered all the aforementioned arguments discussed above, I firmly endorse my point of view that the demerits of making teachers' social or political views known to their children outweigh the merits of preventing to express them on the grounds that it is not only detrimental to class efficiency, but also changes children's thinking.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... in mind, there is a heated controversy as to whether teachers need to express their politica...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 568, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'enjoys'.
Suggestion: enjoys
...nd as a result, they resist with anyone enjoying different attitudes. Therefore, if a st...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of which in English may sound like this, Childrens minds is like a stone, and if ...
^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them on the grounds that it is not only detrimental to class efficiency, but als...
^^
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etrimental to class efficiency, but also changes childrens thinking.
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'as to', 'in summary', 'as a result']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.19918699187 0.229887763892 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.14837398374 0.158761421928 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0731707317073 0.0866891130778 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0406504065041 0.046263068375 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0792682926829 0.0685040099705 116% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140243902439 0.118717715034 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0284552845528 0.0351676179071 81% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66048004051 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.030487804878 0.0309702414327 98% => OK
Particles: 0.0020325203252 0.00188951952338 108% => OK
Determiners: 0.0873983739837 0.0887237588012 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0182926829268 0.0209618222197 87% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0223577235772 0.0139019557991 161% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2588.0 2387.08602151 108% => OK
No of words: 437.0 408.028673835 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92219679634 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.343249427918 0.338922669872 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270022883295 0.251872472559 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187643020595 0.174417080927 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107551487414 0.112833075102 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66048004051 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.524397521467 99% => OK
Word variations: 59.8072425467 59.2087087015 101% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6684587814 68% => OK
Sentence length: 31.2142857143 20.5533526081 152% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.4528821094 48.84282405 193% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 184.857142857 120.699889404 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2142857143 20.5533526081 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.644075263715 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 58.2165740438 45.7405998639 127% => OK
Elegance: 1.37121212121 1.45489161554 94% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389780677199 0.300154397459 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125228857844 0.103427244359 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.101109268094 0.0752933317313 134% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.527013598653 0.497263757937 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.184359892832 0.151897553556 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159194749061 0.114077575197 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925574091692 0.0781384742642 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.393697321572 0.336927656856 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0686725011836 0.067059652881 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28187215169 0.210909579961 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272215404737 0.0618886996521 44% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.6433691756 88% => OK

---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.