Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their political and social views known to students in the classroom.
Various teachers may have a diversity of political and social views. Truth be told, whether teachers should expose their views to students in the classroom or not has generated a lot of controversy lately. As far as I am concerned, teachers should not make their views known to students. By making their views known to students, teachers may affect students' learning abilities, grades, and class times.
First and foremost, exposing teachers' views to students may affect their learning. That is, students may develope a biased view about a subject. For instance, a teacher may think that democracy is not good. Consequently, the students may think that democracy is not good, even though their book states otherwise. Furthermore, students may relate a subject to teacher's views, as though the teacher is contending something just because he believes in it. Therefore, they will not be able to maintain an objective view of different subjects.
Moreover, another aspect of exposing views to students is that it might affect students' grades in a negatively. Students may despise a teacher for her beliefs. For this reason, they may loathe the subject that she is teaching as well. As a result, their grades may diminish in that subject. For instance, my history teacher used to be fond of Adolf Hitler for his artistic traits, and I detested the teacher. Subsequently, I developed a hatred over the subject, and I did not practice the subject. Eventually, I got a low mark in the final exam.
Admiteddly, not to mention the effects of exposing teachers' views to students on the class time would be an oversight. Bringing up social and political views may lead to a debate. A debate in the classroom wastes students' precious time, and leads to degradation of overall quality of the class. Take my mathematics teacher as an example. He used to bring up his political views in the class, which led to a lot of debates. At the end of semester, he could not teach a part of our mathematics book, since he spent so much time on debating political matters in the class.
All in all, teachers should not expose their own views to students, because it may affect the class negatively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90810810811 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72587364782 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3972540792 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.6666666667 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4166666667 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298844133401 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101929536123 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07761679644 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194714039615 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107670842555 0.0645574589148 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.