Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
All people show a certain perspective on the matter. Likewise, the teacher may have one but some people believe that it should be shown to the right place and the right time; and they believe school is not the right place to show. In my opinion, the teacher should not make their social or political views on students in the classroom for the following reasons.
On showing the view about the certain matter, it can build partisanship in the student. As the student believe most of the facts what their teacher imparts on them, partisanship becomes prevalent in their mindsets. they believe or see the world what the teachers think. Unknowingly, they adopt the views of the teacher what the teacher shows them. Furthermore, the creativity and cognitive development of the children may be preoccupied with the told facts. As cognitive development is necessary for the children's mental development, this practice should be ended.
similarly, it brings unnecessary conflicts among the children which they hardly can handle. At this age, they are not mature enough to handle the issue of great depth in social and political matters. On the dark side, the issue only posses the extra burden in their mind which they hardly understand. For instance, if the teacher projects his view about the principle of Marxism, it is an utter perplexing topic to them. some students may let it go but what if one of the students pursue its depth and find the pressure to understand it. At this time, the student may suffer from psychological pressure and he might succumb to do well in the study later on. Therefore, for the sake of the students, this kind of topic requires a lot of rumination better not to expose in front of the students.
To sum up, there is always an appropriate time and place to introduce the perception about the difficult topic. The subject like social and political views need more maturity to understand. So, it is better not to show them in the school where they are only naïve and juvenile students; otherwise, their mental growth and development harshly affected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ip becomes prevalent in their mindsets. they believe or see the world what the teach...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...pment, this practice should be ended. similarly, it brings unnecessary conflicts among ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...t is an utter perplexing topic to them. some students may let it go but what if one ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, likewise, may, similarly, so, therefore, well, for instance, kind of, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88418079096 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61295006834 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511299435028 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0369273403 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6315789474 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192551644312 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643178780088 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838964980575 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123123048373 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487169318108 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.