Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.
In this modern era, people want to imitate each other to heighten themselves. Students are at a crucial age, which chooses their heroes in their life. As a result, a teacher is an important person in their life. In my opinion, teachers should not talk about their political or religious beliefs in the classroom. In the following paragraphs, I will explore into the most conspicuous reasons and examples justifying my viewpoint.
To begin with, teachers have to manage and control their classes to make a convenient and without any tension for the student, which means their ideas about these controversial matters will divide students into many groups to argue with each other. Students are in a sensitive period of their living, which a little contention can have a detrimental effect on their mental features. Although they need to encounter these specific situations, teachers can make an instructive discussion to them. My experience as a student is a compelling example of this. When I was in high school, my history teacher wanted to teach us about the last government in our country. He always talked about the bad things about that government. It was always questioned for me whether that government was bad in all facets or not? My teacher decided to answer me, and he had told us about his belief without any basis on real events. After a while, some students made a complaint to his words. On the other hand, some other students approved their teacher’s beliefs. Eventually, made an argument between students, and even they struggled with each other.
My second noteworthy is that teachers are a reliable person for students, which means that student demands to talk about their problems easily to their teachers. Talking about political beliefs can influence the students to fear to talk about themselves. If teachers want to keep their prestige in student’s views, they would not speak about their ideas in the classroom.
To sum up, it is the best way that the teacher does not talk about his political or religious beliefs in the class. This is because it makes an inevitable tension in the classroom, and they lose their popularity among students.
|2020-01-29||Chengke||66||Read full essay|
|2020-01-29||Chengke||60||Read full essay|
|2020-01-13||Somayya||73||Read full essay|
|2020-01-05||Raziya||73||Read full essay|
|2019-12-07||peymankaz||73||Read full essay|
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples t73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following paragraphs? Movies and television have a more negative effect than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.73
- How humans can help birds to do not hit with the glass windows.70
- European silver coins which found on the site in state Maine.73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, talking about, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00826446281 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70694486203 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520661157025 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7618776131 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5714285714 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222744075692 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750106283939 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502354354419 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154794069312 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318433672153 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.