How can humans maintain Venus
The reading and the lecturer are both about maintaining humans on Venus. The author of the reading feels that Venus is inhospitable for human existence. The lecturer challenges the idea made by the author. He is of opinion that there are some solutions that can help humans to preserve themselves on Venus.
To begin with, the author of the reading states that atmospheric pressure on Venus is 90 times bigger than the Earth's pressure. The reading mentions that all spacecraft that landed on the Venus has been crushed by the pressure. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that establishing a station can be like a flood on a Venus. Additionally, he claims that an object like the balloon can be flooded 50 kilometers far from Venus's surface which the pressure is similar to the earth, approximately.
Secondly, the article says that there is not any reservoir of water on Venus. In the article, it is said that the planet's atmosphere is made of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid and the amount of water vapor and oxygen is low. The lecturer, however, rebuts on this by mentioning that the chemical process in a station can help spaceman. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that making water by this technology is possible to provide pure water for people in the station.
Finally, the author posits that there is a little sunshine in Venus. Moreover, it is stated in the article that the clouds can reflect 60 percent of the sunlight and only 40 percent can get through from this layer and after that, it will block by the carbon dioxide. In contrast, the lecturer's position is the clouds are not so thick and dense. He notes that humans can invent the machine which can avoid the reflection of the sunlight by the clouds. It can make by the electricity in the station to help this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...us is inhospitable for human existence. The lecturer challenges the idea made by th...
^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...us. In the article, it is said that the planets atmosphere is made of carbon dioxide, n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72360248447 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56600682663 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487577639752 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9293278291 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314713499063 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103875790376 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986884917931 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200485499135 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116264624062 0.0443174109184 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.