Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers play a decisive role in every society since they mainly determine the level of success and progress. I agree with this idea that teachers were more appreciated by society in the past rather than nowadays. The reasons to support my viewpoint are elaborated on in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, in the past, fewer people were able to become a teacher. To be more specific, nowadays, a copious amount of people are legible rather than the past and the number of teachers are high. Furthermore,in the past, most of the individuals, who lived in rural areas, had not accessed to study. Therefore, fewer people were teachers. considering the importance of knowledge, people were admired ones who were a teacher or even a literate person. On the contrary, people are able to become a excellent teacher if they want.
Moreover, nowadays, people, especially children, are less respectful towards adults. To put it in other words, students who spend a great deal of their time in the schools, have to respect their teachers. Teachers play a significant role in the students' lives but students not aware about that. On the other hand, in the past, parents thought their kids the importance of teacher in their lives. Therefore, teachers positions in the past was more respectful. An example can shed some light on this issue. One of my classmates in the high school left the class without any permission. In the past, this kinds of behavior was very rare. Besides, parents treated well with teachers in the past.
In conclusion, considering all the mentioned points and examples, I do believe that teachers had a more appreciated and valued position in the past rather than nowadays. This is because only few people would able to become a teacher and the role's of teachers in students' lives was more vital.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rated on in the following paragraphs. To begin with, in the past, fewer people...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...number of teachers are high. Furthermore,in the past, most of the individuals, who ...
^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Considering
... Therefore, fewer people were teachers. considering the importance of knowledge, people wer...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the contrary, people are able to become a excellent teacher if they want. ...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome a excellent teacher if they want. Moreover, nowadays, people, especially c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ss without any permission. In the past, this kinds of behavior was very rare. Beside...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ated well with teachers in the past. In conclusion, considering all the menti...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9348534202 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6551287634 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521172638436 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4313140037 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.75 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.35 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324518801862 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100603118181 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929183650578 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22503659158 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938409522991 0.0645574589148 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.