Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Considering the importance of health and environment in humans' lives, I disagree with this notion that it is more critical for governments to spend money to ameliorate Internet access rather than improve public transportation. The reasons to support my viewpoint are elaborated on in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the improvement of public transportation significantly affects humans' health. To be more specific, nowadays, a copious amount of people use their personal vehicles since they do not access to modern public transportation. It is no secret to anyone that gasses such CO2, NOx, to name but two which have been produced by cars, have negative impacts on people's health and environment. Additionally, when people breathe these kinds of gases, there are exposed to various diseases such as lung cancer. As a result, if governments spend more money on public transportation and make people aware of the benefits of them, individuals will utilize public transportation rather than their personal cars. In this regard, not only can they save their time since they do not need to waste their time on traffic, but also they can breath more fresh air.
Moreover, by having an effective public transportation system in every society, governments are able to gain some revenue. To put it in other words, governments are seeking to find a practical way to fulfill their budget deficiencies. In this regard, numerous governments assign extra taxes on some products, but this method is not feasible in most of the cases. However, modern countries are trying to use more efficient ways, such as improving public transportation to encourage people to use them as an efficient method to make money and achieve countries' budgets. Consequently, governments not only are able to gain their expenses for public transportation but also can save money to spend on other issues such as social welfare projects or providing fast Internet connection for society after a period. Thus, it can be easily concluded that spending more money on public transportation can have more positive impacts than improving Internet access.
In conclusion, contemplating all the reasons and points, I do believe that public transportation's concern is very vital for every society, so governments should consider the importance of that in humans' lives. Not only can public transportation affect humans' health, but also they can help governments to gain money and income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rated on in the following paragraphs. To begin with, the improvement of public...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 838, Rule ID: BREATHE_BREATH[1]
Message: Did you mean 'breathe'? 'breath' is a noun.
Suggestion: breathe
...heir time on traffic, but also they can breath more fresh air. Moreover, by ha...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also they can breath more fresh air. Moreover, by having an effective public ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29743589744 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03384481025 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502564102564 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1281083192 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.125 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327734430204 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115361952228 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100457776197 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24387449344 0.150856017488 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117556923424 0.0645574589148 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.