there is no doubt that nowadays the ability to have communication plays a pivotal role in developing one's characteristic and no one could deny this fact. A vast majority of people are of the opinion that making new friends is a crucial ability because you may travel to another country, as a result, you could not be in touch with your friends in close. I, contrary to popular belief, prefer to make my friendships long-lasting in order to remain delighted over to renew my friends. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons and examples to explicate my vantage point.
One of the reasons comes to my mind at first is that people have more memories with their old friends. When you have a friend from your school, indeed, you have been growing with each other, you have the same memories, you can laugh at the mutual things, you have more fun with each other because, in essence, you are siblings. A study was conducted by a group of psychology researchers at Oxford University on the source of recent innovations. Its result shows that 80 percent of those people who are traveled to a new country for further their studies and are away from their relationships are exposed to depression and suicide.
Another equally noteworthy reason that corroborating my stance on this issue is that people could get along with their old friends easily. To shed light on this issue, take me as an example. Last year, when I was in the last week of the semester, during the university exams, I have to break up with my boyfriend. My high school friend, Sara, devote an enormous amount of his time to talk with me in order to calm me down. On the other hand, Mari with who I spend out my leisure time in university, do not care about my feelings in those days. This experience taught me that in any aspect, leaning on old friendships are of more benefit than new ones.
to wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to the conclusion that based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs, people must have a relationship, no matter they are new or old. However, that was a story in nutshell. Actually, there are other reasons and samples elaborating on this idea which are not mentioned due to the shortage of time. Finally, it is suggested that people could try to keep their old friend bonds in order to have a joyful life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there is no doubt that nowadays the ability t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tion plays a pivotal role in developing ones characteristic and no one could deny th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reasons'' or 'reason's'?
Suggestion: reasons'; reason's
...plicate my vantage point. One of the reasons comes to my mind at first is that peopl...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...s are of more benefit than new ones. to wrap it up, all the aforementioned reas...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, may, so, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61045130641 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60021139413 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541567695962 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1208824988 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.833333333 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3888888889 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259248957162 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724164492854 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535306876066 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152628499873 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038900519757 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.