Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily
Undoubtedly, modern life is very complicated and all human beings want to have a great and happy life. Although our life is ephemeral and transitory, people have a huge attempt to find a way for happiness. This is obvious that human live in social setting and we are human because we live together and we have a lot of interaction with each other. Nevertheless, in my point of view people should have a close group of friends for long time and there is no doubt that this have plenty of benefits for friends.
This is obvious that trust is a major aspect of our life and the only reason that people want to live with each other is being honest. So maybe you can just fall in love with some one that you like but the the important thing is relationship can be over soon if you do not trust each other. Moreover, you can trust someone if you spend long time with him/ her and merely in the specific situations like bad or good you can understand that your friend’s character. Furthermore, a lot of psychological researches investigate the impact of trust on relationships. If you have some close friends that you trust them, you will be very close and this makes your life comfortable and you will find happiness around them. When you need them you know that they will be there for you to help you and to support you.
In spite of what mentioned before, there is no doubt, that making new friends has a lot of profits for us. Even, we cannot find our best friend or friends if we are not able to interact with people very-well. This can be very fun to be friend with lots of people and speak with them about new things. Having new friends can open some doors for us. Some people find their job by some new friends who offer them the job. You never know what will happen if you make new friends in a party, that can be your best chance or the way for your happiness. Social scientists believe that the ability of new friend making is important for our mental health and persons who have lots of friends have better life.
In conclusion, each person based on his values and views is different, I believe that we should have some small close friends who we are trusted and we love for long time as well as having a good ability to making new friends for getting fun and new opportunities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...So maybe you can just fall in love with some one that you like but the the important thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...in love with some one that you like but the the important thing is relationship can be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...in love with some one that you like but the the important thing is relationship can be ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, in conclusion, no doubt, you know, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38732394366 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33268734977 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431924882629 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2008121399 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.833333333 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279090359692 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102685240101 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503178464899 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180364579846 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525914972145 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.