Friendship has always been one of the most significant types of relationships, which has a wide variety of impacts on everybody's life. Concerning this issue, some people believe that people have to preserve their friendship for a long time since it is essential for their euphoria, while some others think finding new friends, even if they will be lost very soon is a more important factor in forming a happy life. As far as I am concerned, I have enough reasons to suppose that the first idea carries more weight. I will enlarge on what I mean in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, although making several new friends can happy people for a short period, it is more essential to maintain it, because lifelong friends have noticeable prolonged effects on each other, such as delight. In other words, the stable happiness cannot compare with ephemeral one. People can earn a long joy when they maintain friendships with even a few friends after a long time since they have distinctive memories together and can catch up on the good old days. The remembrance of memories from different stages of their lives will cheer them up and will make their day. I have to admit that my opinion is profoundly influenced by my own experience. My best friend, who is in Norway nowadays, and I often hold some party and talk about the past time since we have lots of things in common. These sorts of meetings have always made me happy, I burst out laughing and cannot put a stop to it. As a result, preservation of the friendships with a small group for a long time make people happier than making lots of new friendships all the time.
The other reason which deserves some words here lies in the fact that making new friends easily can be detrimental since people cannot be familiar with each other very soon and it can result in being upset because of their behaviors, while people know their lifelong friends' attitudes very well. To clarify this point, finding several new friends that you do not know their characteristics can make you mentally ill since it is more likely that they do some things or say some words which will make you sad. Whereas, retaining old friendships can give rise to joyfulness as easily as possible because their features are predictable for you and won't bother you.
To sum up, given the facts that people have lots in common with lifelong friends and are familiar with their quality, I am of the opinion that maintaining the old friendships is a more noteworthy factor for happiness than being capable to make a number of new friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 726, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ften held some party and talk about the past time since we have lots of things in common....
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, whereas, while, i mean, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71205357143 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48401999774 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491071428571 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.1470360142 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.9375 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307904959378 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106048697837 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911351512232 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211738935078 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499791547866 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.