The reading states that it can be possible to revive the salty lake in California and provide three reasons for support. The lecturer, However, finds all the ideas dubious and provide some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author asserts that using desalination facilities for eliminating the amount of salt is considered as a mitigation activity. In contrast, the professor opposes this point by explaining that it can cause serious problems. By using such facilities, there are amounts of depositions of solids which can be harmful and dangerous for people health. people by inhaling toxic chemical materials which are diffused in the air by chemical solid deposits are in danger.
Second, the author posits that by adding some ocean water, the amount of salt in the lake will decline. On the contrary, the speaker underlines the fact that it requires constructive equipment such as channels and pumps, also the government did not have enough resource to pay for building this expensive construction.
Finally, the reading passage holds the view that it could be possible to build a wall separating two parts with different amount of salt. Conversely, the professor dismisses the issue due to the fact that it does not work very long, furthermore it is not long-lasting because an earthquake in such an area with intense geological activity, can collapse the wall and as a result, the water of two separated part will be mixed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...armful and dangerous for people health. people by inhaling toxic chemical materials wh...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07594936709 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7277232783 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599156118143 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.086487241 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.3 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134457914294 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532585657752 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599720835209 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800532331146 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309034978359 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.