Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to improve the quality of education in a
country is to increase teachers’ salaries.
Throughout history, mankind has been perpetually concerned about the routes to improve the quality of education. In the modern era, this concern has made long-lasting debates among scholars, since the efficiency of education appeared as a critical element in improving a society. The controversial question which arises here is whether universities should allocate more budget on salaries for university professors to increase the quality of education or not. I firmly believe that there are some more reasonable ways to make the education system more appealing rather that spending more money on professors' salaries. There are numerous reasons to illuminate my standpoint, two of which I will aptly elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost no one can cast a shadow of doubt on the remarkable impact of facilities in a university has on the learning efficiency. The more facilities university endow, the higher the yield of learning among students. Willing to improve the quality of education, universities should equip laboratories and classes with state-of-the-art technologies and facilities. This improvement, not only will boost the efficiency, but also will be an incentive to talented students to pick the university as their aim for higher education. In this manner, university will benefit from these facilities without any doubt.
The second noteworthy reason no one should neglect is that increasing the professors' salaries may cause misconceptions among them. It only can be an effective way, if this increase comes as a reward after an accomplishment of a research project or satisfaction of the students of a specific tutor. To put it differently, spending more money on professors' salaries would be beneficial, only if they deserve it. A recent study conducted in my country elucidate my viewpoint meticulously. According to their findings, employees tend to work better if they know their employer is grateful of their toil. Willing to flourish the education quality, universities should put more emphasize on honoring and praising successful professors.
The recapitulation of the aforementioned reasons, lead us to the conclusion that spending more money on professors' salaries wouldn't necessarily improve the quality of education. All in all, that was a story in a nutshell. Obviously, there are many more details and reasons worth discussing which are not mentioned here. It is anticipated that in near future authorities would co-operate with eminent psychologists to find better ways to improve the education system, by providing nice atmosphere for students and university staff.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facilities'' or 'facility's'?
Suggestion: facilities'; facility's
...as on the learning efficiency. The more facilities university endow, the higher the yield ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...nding more money on professors salaries wouldnt necessarily improve the quality of educ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2227.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52605459057 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19379998662 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54094292804 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5184834366 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.35 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.15 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85 5.45110844103 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130270593008 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380559864326 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398068081143 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859341296528 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466426981988 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.