Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way for teachers to make students become more interesting to a subject is to explain how useful/beneficial the subject will be later outside the school.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The most efficient approach to make students want to learn stuff by themselves is let them into the subject. Some people are arguing that the best way for teachers to make students feel more interest in a subject is telling them how useful the subject will be later outside the school. And I agree with this statement.
Granted, there are many ways for teachers to make students interesting to a subject; Like teaching them interesting ways. Math is the most boring subject for many students, the drudgery of doing figures again and again. If a teacher can teach math with more fun ways, like combine math to the science work; Not only to reproduce the prediction done on the paper with math, but also to expect the whole experiment in the lab. It will feel good if the outcome is perfectly the same as the math do.
However, telling students how useful the subject will be later would let them have more willing to study it. Take me as an example. I feel very lost when I was a high school student because I must study science which I am not good at, and my future dream was going to an engineering school. I do not know how science support my dream and I was having a problem with learning it. But later my science teacher told me that how science like material science make the better cable, which allows today’s network engineer invent a more efficient approach to connect very far away cities. And I feel that this subject must have an essential role if I want to be a real engineer, so I become more interested in science.
Furthermore, showing students how useful the subject will be outside the school, will encourage students to make their future career planning, and finally, get interested in the subject. Think of this. People would not plan something they even do not interested in. After showing students what math can do; like calculating asteroid’s orbit, might inspire students who want to be an astronaut and that students would have no more questions that what can math do for his future dream. And he will get interested in math finally because his future dream needs math to support it. Moreover, clothes designer also needs math to calculate their design is right or wrong. No one wants to dress clothes longer than their arms. A teacher should know all students dreams and telling them how this subject can benefit in their future career. Everyone will get interested finally.
In conclusion, there are many ways to make students interested in the subject, but telling them how useful the subject is, can let students have willing to study the subject, and plan the future career for them, which means they are interested in the subject. It is justified to say the best approach for teachers to make students interesting in the subject is telling them how useful the subject will be.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to stuff'
Suggestion: to stuff
...approach to make students want to learn stuff by themselves is let them into the subj...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71919191919 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41844930716 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424242424242 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 705.6 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5629336126 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41775917935 0.236089414692 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138463122688 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129532174207 0.0737576698707 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294416033033 0.150856017488 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104824925466 0.0645574589148 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.