Do you agree or disagree with this following statement,the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reason and example to support your answer
Although a certain conclusion cannot be made, in spite of all undeniable merits of traveling lonely or with family, I firmly concur with the idea that the best way for taking a trip is in a group led by a tour guide. The following paragraphs will substantiate the most outstanding reasons.
First of all, one should take into account this significant fact that such these trips led by a guide is really time saving. As a matter of fact, passengers do not have enough information about tourism attraction of different cities. Tour guide have comprehensible information about city where passengers are visiting. Guides can take passengers to the most attractive places in minimum of the time. To illustrate this, one needs only to refer to many tourists who waste their time to look for sightseeing and monuments. To demonstrate, most of the authorities all over the world contend that having a guide is necessary for passengers unfamiliar with their destination. So they established an experimental program worldwide to compare the efficiency of trips of tourists with and without a guide. The results are surprising: over 90 percent of tourists without a tour leader do not have a pleasant trip and they are exhausted since they waste a plenty of time.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one needs consider another subtle point meticulously that travelling with a group and leader can be cost effective as well. Indeed, by increasing the number of passengers, enormous discount will be offered them. The modern world present abundant examples of shops, restaurants and hotels which offer considerable discount for tourist groups. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that traveling as a group will be definitely more cost effective than travelling solely. Since many of shop owners prefer to present their services and product in a wholesale manner.
Being aware of traveling issues is vital to every tourist to have a nice trip. Taking all aforementioned arguments into account leads us to the conclusion that we should contemplate about efficient ways of travelling. Taking trips in a group by a tour leader save not only tourists’ time but also their budget.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent social research'.
Suggestion: recent social research
...ly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that traveling as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 675, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wholesale manner" with adverb for "wholesale"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r to present their services and product in a wholesale manner. Being aware of traveling issues is vi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, really, so, well, apart from, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16260162602 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95158406174 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0355522662 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.833333333 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170767664179 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489333202085 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469973571818 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117016028307 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562921291991 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.