It is everyone’s moral duty to helping others to have better living. People can donate portion of their money and possessions to charity and the needy. It helps them to feel mentally calm and to live in better society. I strongly believe that it is not necessary that people who have more money dedicate it to charity more. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my view using some reasons and examples.
I think people who have more money work and try harder than others. They can use their money for other purposes. It is not necessary to give away to charity more. They can establish a business and provide employment opportunities for youngsters. Therefore, they not only earn more profit but also benefit others. For example, my uncle only devotes percentage of their income to helping poor people. He established a big company and employed a lot of young people. Thus, his action is helpful for him and others.
Moreover, i believe that the rich should not assign more money to the poor because it makes poor people become lazy. It prevents them from making efforts to earn money. For instance, I know a family who are poor and a rich man support them. Thus, they do make any attempt to make money, while they have bodily health and can try to find a job. As a result, rich people can assign their extra money to other important purposes.
To sum up, in my point of view, rich people should donate part of their money to charity. It is not essential that if they have more money, they give away it more. They should save it for emergency situations and for personal purpose. Sometimes helping poor people prevents them from trying to work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s action is helpful for him and others. Moreover, i believe that the rich should...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...pful for him and others. Moreover, i believe that the rich should not assign...
^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tra money to other important purposes. To sum up, in my point of view, rich peo...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le prevents them from trying to work.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68367346939 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39691683815 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.1816477265 48.9658058833 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.5909090909 100.406767564 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3636363636 20.6045352989 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04545454545 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358791818355 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116548062059 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130998628167 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245723920401 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575233242272 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 11.7677419355 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.