It is obvious that there is different ways to recognize the personality or character of a people. A lot of factors affect the character of a person. I strongly believe that judgment about individual’s personality and character based on clothes and the way they dress is not reasonable. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my reasons and examples.
I think the type of clothes and the way people wear cannot indicate humans’ personality. Some people think persons who put on expensive clothing are respectful ones, while it is not a true opinion in many cases. In other words, the important factor indicating humans’ character is their behavioral traits. For example, I have a friend who always cost a great deal of money to buy high-priced clothes and thus others imagine that she has a good personality. But unfortunately, after a while, other people who communicate with her observe their impression about her was wrong. Therefore, the type of clothes can never be representative of people’s character and personality.
I believe that the way people choose to dress can be based on their interests not their character. Some emphasizes that the color of clothes shows people’s personality, whereas in my point of view, it cannot be considered a deciding factor. For instance, I have a friend who has lot of interest in wearing black clothes. As a result, others think that he has a sad personality, while he is a happy person.
To sum up, humans’ character and personality depends on different elements. Only the custom people dress cannot indicate their character. Their behavioral qualities and interest are decisive factors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are different ways'?
Suggestion: there are different ways
It is obvious that there is different ways to recognize the personality or charact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ersonality, while he is a happy person. To sum up, humans' character and pe...
^^^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ties and interest are decisive factors.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, in many cases, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 270.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19259259259 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17095010276 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514814814815 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3435679954 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.4705882353 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8823529412 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293526744956 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956937094395 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830940554658 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184067873609 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195403879241 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.