Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Determining how to spend money in the universities wisely to improve the quality of education is of paramount importance. Training experts in various fields of industry is the most important goal of all universities, hence, it is crucial to examine how the quality of education would improve. Spending lots of money with no perspective and no goal is waste of money and would not help. Some people may agree to increase the professors' salaries for the sake of this improvement while others would disagree and have other options. In my view, increasing the salaries for the university professor would not help and there exist other choices which are most likely to be helpful because of two main reasons.
The main reason is that, the money can be spent on constructing and enhancing the quality of laboratories in the university. Since the professors are interested in the field of their expertise, they usually do all they can do not regarding the monetary issues. They teach their students in the best way they can but there are matters that influence the understanding of students.
Students usually learn better when they are learning with experiments rather than by mere theory. Therefore, providing students with better and broader facilities would help them to learn more efficiently. For example, when I was in university I was participating in a series of courses about special electric circuits. In these courses I was just being tutored theoretically and had not seen the circuits so I had no idea what I was learning about. However, after three terms the university held a workshop in this field where I just started to recognize what I was dealing with through these terms. It helped me a lot in my understanding and at the moment I work in a company where these circuits are being developed. As you can see, attending in a workshop helped me much better to understand the topic and make use of it.
The second reason is that, empowering the connections between the university and industry is a very important issue. The whole idea of the university is to address the industrial problems. If they were more projects in the universities it would help students to encounter different problems in reality and also it would lead for the professors to earn more money. Hence, the more powerful this connection, the better quality of education. For instance, one of my professors was known to have lots of industrial projects. Through the courses with this particular professor I learned much more things than others. This experience thought me that the connections between the industry and university is one of the most important thing to improve learning quality.
In sum, though some may disagree with my opinion I think there are better ways to improve educational quality rather than by increasing the professors' salaries. Learning quality would improve faster not only by means of enhancement of laboratories but also by making powerful links between industry and the university. Therefore universities should think of alternative ways to improve their efficiency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... of students. Students usually learn better when they are learning with experiments...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 320, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ks between industry and the university. Therefore universities should think of alternativ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, of course, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2580.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06876227898 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86610643573 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449901768173 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 812.7 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7603380996 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.36 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245644037029 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073502294311 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499639749144 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136991229508 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566889677677 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.