Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Teachers should be one of the most appreciated people in each society since they are the ones who train and teach young children and shape their most important characteristics. Determining whether they were more appreciated in the past or now, and the reasons for that, is an important matter. Some may think that they were more appreciated in the past while others would disagree. In my opinion, in past they had better social position and were more valued. I feel this way because of two important reasons which I will briefly introduce in the following paragraphs.

The main reason is that they were almost the most knowledgeable people in the society in the past. Since, the education was not well-developed and advanced, the number of educated people in the past was low and teachers were standing out among the people. Because of this exclusiveness, people were used to respect and appreciate them. According to my grandfather, people used to treat with the teachers as if they were kings. When they wanted to buy something from stores for example, people wanted to get as less money as possible from them.

The other reason is that there were less teachers in the past. The number of educated people and accordingly the number of teachers were low. When something is scarce in a society, its value considered to be high. For instance, my father said to me that when he was a student in the elementary school his teacher decided to go to another school. His decision disrupted the whole school, since there was no other teachers available. The school tried to convince him to stay in the school and doubled his salary, and afterwards everyone in the school tried to treat him well.

To sum up, tough some may disagree with my opinion, I deeply believe that the teachers were more appreciated and valued in the past. Not only were they supposed to be highly knowledgeable in the past but there were less teachers also. Though these reasons were not logical, there are plenty of reasons why they should be appreciated. I think the teachers should be appreciated more since they are in the charge for training our children that are the ones who will be the most important influence in the society in the feature. Hence, according to more logical reasons, all the people should learn to appreciate teachers more.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
... that, is an important matter. Some may think that they were more appreciated in the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun teachers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... The other reason is that there were less teachers in the past. The number of edu...
^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun teachers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...nowledgeable in the past but there were less teachers also. Though these reasons wer...
^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...n the past but there were less teachers also. Though these reasons were not logical,...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, briefly, but, hence, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82456140351 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59802695026 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443609022556 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9283625725 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38095238095 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339168614005 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128552385475 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831656437168 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229714827489 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833088608817 0.0645574589148 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.