Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The debate on whether increasing the salaries of university professors would enhance the educational process in colleges and universities or would have no effect on the overall process has garnered a wide range of views. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration to examine the constructive and destructive facets of this issue. Some people posit that the investment of professors by raising their salaries is the best way to improve the schooling process in colleges. On the other hand, some others take the opposite side and disagree. From my vantage point, I concur with the former group and aver that increasing professor's salary is an investment in the future of the educational process. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
The first exquisite point to be considered is that the rising of university teachers' salaries will increase their efforts. According to researchers in the education field, professors' performance will improve dramatically after increasing their stipends. A vivid example that can shed light on the subject is one from my country. In the last year, the government in my country has increased the salaries of teachers in colleges and schools. Many statics indicate that this increase affects the educational process positively. All in all, rising stipends will encourage the professors to put their hearts and souls into teaching.
Secondly, another reason which deserves some words to say is that when professors feel that their financial situations are stable, they will focus more on their works without worrying about money. To be specific, teaching and doing research needs people who do not have any financial problems. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. During doing my research on the air pollution topic, the university gave me monthly stipends. Although this stipend was little, it covered all my tuition and expenses, which made me focus on my research.
To wrap it up, contemplating all aforesaid reasons, one can soon realize the importance of improving professors' financial situations to focus on the teaching process and encourage them doing their best.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 65
- In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explor 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples t 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The knowledge we gain from personal experiences is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Do not use memorized examples 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 663, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...e former group and aver that increasing professors salary is an investment in the future o...
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...g to researchers in the education field, professors performance will improve dram...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, i feel, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32011331445 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83570961612 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541076487252 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.541498806 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13152863287 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416467717768 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301865783302 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775956048538 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284423713159 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.