Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which student must work together, the students learn much more effectively then when they are asked to work alone on projects.
The undeniable instinct of each person is his inclination toward the teamwork. Actually, the being a group member is one of the crucial aspects of each individual, and teamwork possesses its own benefits and disadvantages. While some people are in the conviction that the project assigned by the teacher should be a group project; others, on the other hand, believe otherwise. I absolutely agree with the first belief and will cogently explicate stance on this issue in what follows.
To begin with, the first reason formed my outlook is that with the teamwork, students are more likely to learn comprehensively. Indeed, a specific field is examined by various outlooks of team member; as a result, a complete and holistic interpretation of this issue is presented. As the students share and exchange their different perspectives, most valid and complete understanding is shaped. A vivid example can be given to shed a light on the issue is my own instance. When I was a high school student, as I studied chemistry with the group, I studied the physic lonely. In the chemistry, I gained very deep insight, since I asked my misunderstandings and mistakes from my team members, and they taught that field with the most comprehensible and detailed way. On the contrast, in the physic, I solo memorized the formulas to solve the problems, and as I did not learn the logic relation of the formulas, it was an arduous task for me to pass the physic test. This example lucidly demonstrates how the teamwork is beneficial in the learning process.
The second factor which certifies my idea is that teamwork has another advantage apart from the educational side. The team works in the school is a proper preparation for the social interaction. Unfortunately, the majority of children are the sole kid in the family and they do not know how to act in the social community. According to the noteworthy, intelligence survey conducted in my country, approximately sixty-five percent of the children in Iran are the solo kid in the family. Moreover, based on another statistic released from the other survey, nearly seventy-nine percent of those kids suffer the disability of social interaction. In this chaotic condition, the school team works as a sound solution to overcome this problem. The students learn how to share their thoughts without bothering or neglecting other member's thought.
Nevertheless, some people may assume that in the teamwork the students do not gain their deserved record. However, they underestimate the teacher's capability in the distinguishing the students' abilities. Although, a student can state that the specific ratio of the project is done by his self, the teacher based on the student's progress in the class is able to find out whether he is lying or not?
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reason can lead us to the conclusion that the teamwork in the school is not only helpful in the learning process, but also it is beneficial for social interaction. Therefore, based on what discussed here, I firmly recommend that the project in the school is done in the team rather and lonely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 840, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng or neglecting other members thought. Nevertheless, some people may assume tha...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...record. However, they underestimate the teachers capability in the distinguishing the st...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'apart from', 'as to', 'as a result', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225303292894 0.229887763892 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.147313691508 0.158761421928 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0831889081456 0.0866891130778 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0485268630849 0.046263068375 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.051993067591 0.0685040099705 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119584055459 0.118717715034 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0381282495667 0.0351676179071 108% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.97541851442 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0207972270364 0.0309702414327 67% => OK
Particles: 0.00346620450607 0.00188951952338 183% => OK
Determiners: 0.149046793761 0.0887237588012 168% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0103986135182 0.0209618222197 50% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0121317157712 0.0139019557991 87% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3120.0 2387.08602151 131% => OK
No of words: 519.0 408.028673835 127% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01156069364 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35838150289 0.338922669872 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28901734104 0.251872472559 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.217726396917 0.174417080927 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.121387283237 0.112833075102 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97541851442 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504816955684 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 60.2524538712 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 21.625 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1278687445 48.84282405 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 120.699889404 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.791666666667 0.644075263715 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 50.526734104 45.7405998639 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.54545454545 1.45489161554 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268156160176 0.300154397459 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117571492491 0.103427244359 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0792041954597 0.0752933317313 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.575240620694 0.497263757937 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.148129852571 0.151897553556 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121587523762 0.114077575197 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520563703418 0.0781384742642 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.575920580185 0.336927656856 171% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0254353435871 0.067059652881 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200199531276 0.210909579961 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352222135152 0.0618886996521 57% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.86379928315 233% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 2.4623655914 366% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.