ets.test 1
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the term of altruism. While the reading part lists some clues to support the idea that the altruism means sacrifices the own benefit due to the group advantages and exemplify this issue in both animals and people, the professor counters these specific points and presents some reasons to call into the question for the information given in the passage.
First of all, the passage mentions to the meerkat which puts his survival in danger till protect its other team member. However, the instructor challenges the validity of this belief for the sake of well-examined study conducted on the meerkat's life. As she asserts, the meerkat skips just after its alarm. Therefore, it is not is peril as assumed in the article. As the meerkat lives in the burrows after its signal, it runs away by the burrows, and it will be in safe. On the other hand, the other team members will be in danger for the sake of the signal indication by the predator.
Second, the article posits that the meerkat does not eat before its total group members have eaten the food; as a result, it is a symbol of the altruism. On the contrary, the lecturer dismisses the accuracy of this assertion. Based on the exact and precise examination has been done the meerkat's eating habit, the meerkat eats before the standing guard. Consequently, there is no sense of the unselfishness as mentioned in the text.
Finally, the text asserts that the feeling of the sacrifices exists among the people since they donate their body organs or share their food with the strangers. On the other sites, the professor casts doubt on the accuracy of this belief. As she declares, there is a list of nonmaterial prizes such as the public approval and public appreciation or the sense of the self-worth which persuade the individual to sacrifice his organ or food. Thus, there is a motivation which obliges to people to do that action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'meerkats'' or 'meerkat's'?
Suggestion: meerkats'; meerkat's
...of well-examined study conducted on the meerkats life. As she asserts, the meerkat skips...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259459459459 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.137837837838 0.158904122519 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0567567567568 0.0723426182421 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.027027027027 0.0435111971325 62% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0405405405405 0.0277247811725 146% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137837837838 0.128828473217 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0324324324324 0.0370669169778 87% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51274916692 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0189189189189 0.0208969081088 91% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.178378378378 0.128158765124 139% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00540540540541 0.0158828679856 34% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00810810810811 0.0114777025283 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1945.0 1645.83664459 118% => OK
No of words: 336.0 271.125827815 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78869047619 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.315476190476 0.374372842146 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247023809524 0.287516216867 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.16369047619 0.187439937562 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0922619047619 0.113142543107 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51274916692 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 59.0550416068 53.8517498576 110% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.7502111507 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.159761716 49.3711431718 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5625 132.220823453 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.7502111507 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 45.7023809524 50.5018328374 90% => OK
Elegance: 2.09210526316 1.90840788429 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146845716421 0.142949733639 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0659858917729 0.0787303798458 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.635489236722 0.631733273073 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165601056209 0.139662658121 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.601799956094 0.414875509568 145% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0618330599989 0.0530846634433 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.