1. In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author of the issue claims that there is no effort ended to striking contribution unless it affected by the past achievement. This is the assertion with which I partially disagree. In the following paragraphs, I will list the most conspicuous reasons to support my standpoint.
First of all, the generalization of the achievement to the important portion in all fields of endeavors to merely the past experiences is a vein action. Indeed, there is a list of factors which are effective at this success. For instance, the influence of knowledge and hardworking are underestimated by this assertion. According to the noteworthy intelligence research conducted by The University of Tehran, both knowledge and hard-work possess fifty-five percent effects on the achievement of success. According to this data, the solely emphasizing to the previous achievement for reaching success is not trustworthy.
Another equally important issue which should be considered is the initial phase of any kind of activity which does not own any rearing from the past achievement. For example, in the field of science, the formation of its initial step has occurred for the sake of scholars’ creative and intelligent mind and there was no support from the ancestors for their achievements. If I have to specify my instance, I would like to shed light on the field of aerospace. In its primary stage, it was an unknown area for people, even for forefathers it was just a fiction which they could only imagine it. However, with the intelligence and efforts of NASA and the first landed spaceship on the moon, this field of science had been established. Therefore, this example illustrates the shakiness of this claim.
However, the complete ignorance of the adduced claim will not be a wise option. Since the continuous of the specific path which was partially passed by the ancestors requires the dependence on them. Their previous endeavors done by forefather can be categorized into two groups of successful and unsuccessful, both of which are beneficial for continuing the path. If they were successful, there will be a basement for flourishment and the result of current efforts will a step further than previous success. On the other hand, if the result of the previous effort was unsuccess. The probability of making the mistake is reduced.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons represent the adherence for the plausibility of viewpoint.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...n all fields of endeavors to merely the past experiences is a vein action. Indeed, there is a li...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dduced claim will not be a wise option. Since the continuous of the specific path whi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence for the plausibility of viewpoint.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17929292929 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09512631527 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517676767677 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4450678778 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178003054598 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513094682838 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458166852699 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861926305535 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480437959382 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.