tpo29
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the accuracy of migration hypothesis, related to the Edmontosaurus to overcome the inhospitable condition in winter. While the reading section lists some reasons to give adherence to this incident, the professor casts doubt on the validity of these reasons and presents some clues to call into the question for the information provided in the reading part.
First of all, the article mentions to the Edmontosaurus's diet, which was a herbivore and the demand for vegetation led to migration. However, the instructor challenges its validity. The professor states that during the summer, in the North Slope, there was plenty of food supply, which caused by the daily 24 hours of direct sunlight. As a result, the myriad source of vegetation died out after each summer and stored for winter usages. In addition, the Edmontosaurus was able to eat the dead plant matter.
Next, meanwhile, the text posits that the Edmontosaurus lives in the herd and the living in a herd is a logic reason for the migration. On the contrast, the lecturer refutes this claim. She asserts that there are the other reasons for living in a herd. For instance, the animal lives in a herd to protect itself from the feasible danger of predators; such as a specific elk which utilizes this method to defense itself. Therefore, the Edmontosaurus could live in a herd for defense itself.
Last, the passage surmises that the dinosaur’s physical ability helped it to move a long distance. On the other hands the professor casts doubt on this issue since solo the adult Edmontosaurus possessed this capability; moreover, the young Edmontosaurus had this problem to keep pace with the adult dinosaurs and they migrated in a speed, which could slow down the whole herd. Besides, the juvenile Edmontosaurus was not able to protect itself lonely. Thus, the adult dinosaurs did not leave them alone. Consequently, they did not migrate.
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.277628032345 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.121293800539 0.158904122519 76% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0458221024259 0.0723426182421 63% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0296495956873 0.0435111971325 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0269541778976 0.0277247811725 97% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118598382749 0.128828473217 92% => OK
Participles: 0.010781671159 0.0370669169778 29% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.87767192298 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0350404312668 0.0208969081088 168% => OK
Particles: 0.00539083557951 0.00154638098197 349% => OK
Determiners: 0.167115902965 0.128158765124 130% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00539083557951 0.0158828679856 34% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010781671159 0.0114777025283 94% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1968.0 1645.83664459 120% => OK
No of words: 323.0 271.125827815 119% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09287925697 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.349845201238 0.374372842146 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269349845201 0.287516216867 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.188854489164 0.187439937562 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12693498452 0.113142543107 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87767192298 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554179566563 0.539623497131 103% => OK
Word variations: 59.3948695817 53.8517498576 110% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3470071879 49.3711431718 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.764705882 132.220823453 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.941176470588 0.878197800319 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 45.9349845201 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 2.28787878788 1.90840788429 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.629333929029 0.549887131256 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118182039467 0.142949733639 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0823000748442 0.0787303798458 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.589659619891 0.631733273073 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17542299222 0.139662658121 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.28636831638 0.266732575781 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120221025414 0.103435571967 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.517294756863 0.414875509568 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0203560751358 0.0530846634433 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.492610026768 0.40443939384 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350593797345 0.0528353158467 66% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.