TPO29
The lecture and the article are bothe about dinasours survival in the wintertime when the wheather was very cold and unhospitable. The auther feels that dinosaurs migrate to south to survive and provide three reasons of support. The lecture challenges the claim made by the article, He is of the opinion that these explanations are faulty.
To begine with, The author states that there would have no plants in the winter for dinosaurs to eat; therefore, they migrate to find plants as a diet. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture, He is of the opinion that in the summer the wheather was very warmer than now and the length of the day was 20 hours so the condition for growing was very good. After summer, in the winter there were a lot of dead plants as food so there are not any lack of plants as food in the winter.
Secondly, the author argues that dinosaurs live in the herd and because of that they should migrate. The lecture, howevere, rebuts this by mentioning that they live in the herd for other reasons like extra protection. For example, Rosevelt Elc live in a herd in the USA and it never migrates.
Last but not least, the writer posits that big dinosaurs were physically capable to migrate. They run very fast and they had strong muscles. In contrast, the lecture posision is that the dinosaurs herd was consist of juveniles and the physical attributes did not allow them to migrate. They wre very weak and they could not follow thier parent and also they ccould not survive alone if they parents did not supervise them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e and provide three reasons of support. The lecture challenges the claim made by th...
^^^
Line 7, column 392, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'parent'
Suggestion: parent
...o they ccould not survive alone if they parents did not supervise them.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64492753623 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34483561114 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514492753623 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0341983273 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6153846154 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20427352159 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749831246689 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456634608663 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119696058415 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343246084925 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.