TPO15
The lecture and the article are both about the ways to stop the spread of cane toads. The article fells that cane toads are the important danger for the australian environment and proposed three manner in order to limit their population. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the article, He is of the opinion that these ways are faulty.
To begine with, the writer states that national fance are very paractical to limited the cane toad access to the vast of Australian nature. The specific argument is challenged by the lecture. He claims that national fance cannot prevent the cane toads, because the young toads and the eggs of cane taods are exist near the streams and the rivers. Therefore, the rivers and the streams can be carried by the water fellow to the other area among fances. In conclusion, the fances are not functional.
Secondly, the author suggests that toads can be captured and destroyed by the haunters and volunteers. The lecturer, however, rebusts this by mentioning that the volunteers are not educated to distinguish the differences between frogs and cane toads. Therefore, local people may be distroy frogs which are very essential for the Australian environment instead of cane toads.
Last but not least, the article posits that the government employ some researchers to developing some especial viruses which are harmfull for the cane toads and can kill them. In contrast, the lectirer position is that these kinds of viruses can be harmful for all of the cane toads in the world like american cane toads. The cane toads can be carried by the researchers and by pets collectors to America and the virus can killed all the American cane toads. This issue is a disaster for the ecosystem because canes are the vide part of the American invironement and ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ner in order to limit their population. The lecturer challenges the claim made by t...
^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ng toads and the eggs of cane taods are exist near the streams and the rivers. Theref...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 262, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ese kinds of viruses can be harmful for all of the cane toads in the world like american c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97697368421 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51955432553 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483552631579 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1236149292 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.866666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391303718463 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133526453167 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944510393564 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234657399079 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568705915626 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.